Hygraph vs Magnolia

Side by side on the same benchmark criteria.

Add a toolUp to 4 at once.

Criteria	Hygraph	Magnolia
Weighted Score	3.3/5	3.6/5
Pricing	Free Hobby plan available; Growth tier starts at $199/mo; custom Enterprise pricing for federation and advanced security.	Custom enterprise pricing for DX Cloud and Self-Managed tiers; free open-source Community Edition available.
Platform Type	Headless CMS	Headless CMS
Content modelling & structured content	4.6/5	4.5/5
Editorial experience	2.5/5	4.6/5
API performance & delivery	4.6/5	4.5/5
SEO & publishing features	3.0/5	3.0/5
Scalability & reliability	4.2/5	4.7/5
Extensibility	3.8/5	4.4/5
Localisation & multi-site	3.5/5	4.6/5
AI & automation	4.0/5	4.5/5
Revenue integrations	2.0/5	2.8/5
Security & compliance	3.5/5	4.6/5
Strengths	✓ Native GraphQL makes it easy to structure a complex content model ✓ Smart Edge Cache and AI-powered features make content delivery fast	✓ Strong visual editor and API delivery ✓ Governed AI agents for drafting, translation and metadata
Limitations	✗ UI is not suitable for fast-paced newsrooms ✗ Updating the schema requires tech support	✗ UI could use more admin features ✗ High operation cost

Hygraph

3.3

Rating

★ 3.3/5

Pricing

Free Hobby plan available; Growth tier starts at $199/mo; custom Enterprise pricing for federation and advanced security.

Platform

Headless CMS

Scores

Content modelling & structured content

4.6

Editorial experience

2.5

API performance & delivery

4.6

SEO & publishing features

3.0

Scalability & reliability

4.2

Extensibility

3.8

Localisation & multi-site

3.5

AI & automation

4.0

Revenue integrations

2.0

Security & compliance

3.5

Strengths

✓ Native GraphQL makes it easy to structure a complex content model

✓ Smart Edge Cache and AI-powered features make content delivery fast

Limitations

✗ UI is not suitable for fast-paced newsrooms

✗ Updating the schema requires tech support

Magnolia

3.6