Skip to main content
All comparisons

LiveRamp vs OnAudience

Side by side on the same benchmark criteria.

Up to 4 at once.
LiveRamp
LiveRamp
4.1
Rating
★ 4.1/5
Pricing
Custom enterprise pricing based on data volume, identity sync frequency, and module selection; no public tiers available.
Platform
Customer data platform
Scores
First-party data collection & onboarding
4.6
Segmentation & modelling
4.5
Activation & monetisation
4.7
Cookieless & identity readiness
4.8
Privacy, consent & governance
4.6
Performance & real-time scale
3.5
Audience analytics & reporting
4.2
Integrations
4.6
Ad-ops usability
2.8
Strengths
✓ Specialist in TV and streaming platform ad data — a fast-growing segment
✓ Authenticated Traffic Solutions eliminates reliance on third-party cookies
Limitations
✗ Massive data volume slows the first-party data onboarding process
✗ Pricing not publicly transparent — enterprise-focused
OnAudience
OnAudience
3.0
Rating
★ 3.0/5
Pricing
Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote.
Platform
Data management platform
Scores
First-party data collection & onboarding
3.0
Segmentation & modelling
3.8
Activation & monetisation
3.0
Cookieless & identity readiness
2.8
Privacy, consent & governance
3.0
Performance & real-time scale
3.5
Audience analytics & reporting
2.8
Integrations
3.4
Ad-ops usability
3.0
Strengths
✓ Global audience data covering 200+ markets and 4,100 predefined segments
✓ Segments available in buying platforms including Microsoft Advertising and PubMatic
Limitations
✗ Less widely known globally than Permutive, LiveRamp, or Lotame
✗ Third-party data model offers publishers little route to monetise their own audiences

Popular comparisons in this benchmark

Find Best ToolsWhich publishing platforms are currently rated as best-in-cl...