Dianomi vs Sharethrough

Side by side on the same benchmark criteria.

Add a toolUp to 4 at once.

Criteria	Dianomi	Sharethrough
Weighted Score	3.7/5	3.5/5
Pricing	Performance-based pricing typically using CPC (Cost Per Click) or CPV (Cost Per View) models; publishers operate on a revenue-share basis.	Standard SSP fee/rev-share
Platform Type	Native ad network	Supply-side platform
Revenue yield & demand quality	4.2/5	4.2/5
Recommendation widget performance	3.0/5	3.0/5
Ad quality & content standards	4.0/5	3.8/5
Publisher control over placements	3.0/5	3.0/5
Reader experience & page speed	3.2/5	4.4/5
Reporting, reconciliation & payout reliability	3.0/5	2.4/5
Formats & integration	4.3/5	4.3/5
Commercial terms transparency	1.8/5	2.6/5
Privacy & standards compliance	4.0/5	3.2/5
Strengths	✓ Business-focus helps identify fit ✓ Full ad inventory monetization	✓ Excellent rendering quality ✓ Broad DSP demand
Limitations	✗ Lack of transparent pricing	✗ Lower margins than direct sales ✗ Dependence on programmatic trends

Dianomi

3.7

Rating

★ 3.7/5

Pricing

Performance-based pricing typically using CPC (Cost Per Click) or CPV (Cost Per View) models; publishers operate on a revenue-share basis.

Platform

Native ad network

Scores

Revenue yield & demand quality

4.2

Recommendation widget performance

3.0

Ad quality & content standards

4.0

Publisher control over placements

3.0

Reader experience & page speed

3.2

Reporting, reconciliation & payout reliability

3.0

Formats & integration

4.3

Commercial terms transparency

1.8

Privacy & standards compliance

4.0

Strengths

✓ Business-focus helps identify fit

✓ Full ad inventory monetization

Limitations

✗ Lack of transparent pricing

Sharethrough

3.5

Rating

★ 3.5/5

Pricing

Standard SSP fee/rev-share