Skip to main content
All comparisons

OKO vs Setupad

Side by side on the same benchmark criteria.

Up to 4 at once.
OKO
OKO
3.2
Rating
★ 3.0/5
Pricing
Revenue share, reported at 15% of revenue from the subsidiary AdX account; confirm terms with the vendor.
Platform
Managed monetization
Scores
Yield Uplift & RPM Growth
3.2
Auction Setup & Bidder Coverage
3.2
Revenue Reporting & Forecasting
2.0
Inventory Control & Demand Visibility
2.0
Integration Effort & Ad-Ops Workload
3.2
Direct Demand & Partner Quality
3.4
Page Speed & Core Web Vitals
2.5
Consent & Privacy Readiness
2.5
Published Pricing & Revenue Share
2.8
Onboarding & Ongoing Support
2.8
Strengths
✓ Access to AdX demand without building a programmatic stack
✓ Light integration: ads.txt lines, header code and ad units
Limitations
✗ 2 million monthly page-view minimum
✗ Placements must be approved by OKO in advance
Setupad
Setupad
4.2
Rating
★ 4.2/5
Pricing
Self-Serve: fixed €0.05 CPM fee, replacing a 20% revenue-share commission. Managed AdOps support and consultations are available; contact the vendor for terms.
Platform
Yield optimisation platform
Scores
Yield Uplift & RPM Growth
3.8
Auction Setup & Bidder Coverage
4.2
Revenue Reporting & Forecasting
3.8
Inventory Control & Demand Visibility
4.0
Integration Effort & Ad-Ops Workload
3.8
Direct Demand & Partner Quality
3.5
Page Speed & Core Web Vitals
3.6
Consent & Privacy Readiness
3.8
Published Pricing & Revenue Share
4.0
Onboarding & Ongoing Support
3.5
Strengths
✓ Publisher keeps stack ownership and is paid directly by SSPs
✓ Published fixed €0.05 CPM pricing instead of a revenue share
Limitations
✗ Requires the publisher's own Google Ad Manager account
✗ Fixed CPM fee applies even on low-value impressions

Popular comparisons in this benchmark

Go DeeperWhich publishing platforms are currently rated as best-in-cl...