Skip to main content

At a glance

  • Ad Orbit scores 4.2/5 and Pipedrive scores 2.5/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent CRM solutions benchmark, both assessed on the same 11 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are order-to-invoice & ad server integration (Ad Orbit 4.6, Pipedrive 1.5) and sales team usability (Ad Orbit 2.8, Pipedrive 4.6); they are within 0.3 on 2 of 11 criteria.
  • Ad Orbit is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Pipedrive for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Ad Orbit scores 3.2 and Pipedrive 4.3 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 4 publishers use Ad Orbit and 1 use Pipedrive.
  • Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Ad Orbit is stronger on order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.6 vs 1.5), reader & subscriber relationship data (3.8 vs 2.2) and media sales pipeline & proposals (4.7 vs 3.2).

Pipedrive is stronger on sales team usability (4.6 vs 2.8).

Which one fits

Choose Ad Orbit if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight order-to-invoice & ad server integration, reader & subscriber relationship data and media sales pipeline & proposals heavily — Ad Orbit leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Pipedrive if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight sales team usability, mobile & field sales and integrations heavily — Pipedrive leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Ad Orbit and Pipedrive in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 8 scored tools are in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAd OrbitPipedrive
Media sales pipeline & proposals14% of capability4.73.2
Advertiser & agency account management12% of capability4.23.0
Integrations12% of capability3.84.5
Order-to-invoice & ad server integration12% of capability4.61.5
Reader & subscriber relationship data10% of capability3.82.2
Sales reporting & forecasting10% of capability4.03.5
Sales team usability8% of capability2.84.6
Workflow automation8% of capability4.44.0
Implementation & migration6% of capability3.63.8
Data security & permissions4% of capability3.03.0
Mobile & field sales4% of capability3.64.5
Capability45% of composite4.03.3
Publisher fit40% of composite4.91.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.24.3

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAd OrbitPipedrive
Pricing transparency4.24.8
Entry cost3.34.7
Implementation cost2.04.5
Hidden-fee risk3.93.5
Ongoing cost2.64.2

Ad Orbit pricing

From $76/user/month (Standard, 5-user minimum). (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)

Pipedrive pricing

Lite from $14/month per seat. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)

What users say

Ad Orbit

11 positive · 2 neutral · 0 negative

Pipedrive

21 positive · 49 neutral · 13 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Ad Orbit scores 4.2 and Pipedrive scores 2.5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best CRM Solutions for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/ad-orbit/pipedrive, verified Nov 12, 2026)

Common questions

How do Ad Orbit and Pipedrive differ?

Ad Orbit is stronger on order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.6 vs 1.5), reader & subscriber relationship data (3.8 vs 2.2) and media sales pipeline & proposals (4.7 vs 3.2). Pipedrive is stronger on sales team usability (4.6 vs 2.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Ad Orbit or Pipedrive?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Ad Orbit scores 3.2/5 and Pipedrive scores 4.3/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (11 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers. See alternatives to Ad Orbit or alternatives to Pipedrive.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.

Explore AlternativesWhich CRM options are better suited for smaller media publis...