Skip to main content

Affiliate.com vs Stay22

Last verified Oct 19, 2026

At a glance

  • Affiliate.com scores 3.3/5 and Stay22 scores 3.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent affiliate networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are reporting & api (Affiliate.com 4.7, Stay22 2.4) and product feeds & price comparison (Affiliate.com 4.6, Stay22 3.5); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Affiliate.com is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Stay22 for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Affiliate.com scores 2.8 and Stay22 4.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 0 publishers use Affiliate.com and 12 use Stay22.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Affiliate.com is stronger on reporting & API (4.7 vs 2.4), product feeds & price comparison (4.6 vs 3.5) and merchant & programme coverage (4.6 vs 3.8).

Stay22 is stronger on payment reliability & thresholds (3.9 vs 3.0).

Which one fits

Choose Affiliate.com if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight reporting & API, product feeds & price comparison and merchant & programme coverage heavily — Affiliate.com leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Stay22 if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight payment reliability & thresholds, commission rates & payout terms and link automation & commerce content tools heavily — Stay22 leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Affiliate.com and Stay22 in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAffiliate.comStay22
Commission rates & payout terms14% of capability2.83.4
Merchant & programme coverage14% of capability4.63.8
Tracking accuracy & attribution14% of capability4.03.2
Link automation & commerce content tools12% of capability4.34.6
Payment reliability & thresholds10% of capability3.03.9
Reporting & API10% of capability4.72.4
Product feeds & price comparison8% of capability4.63.5
Disclosure & compliance tools6% of capability1.81.8
Integration6% of capability3.83.5
Publisher approval & programme access6% of capability3.03.0
Capability45% of composite3.83.4
Publisher fit40% of composite3.04.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.84.6

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAffiliate.comStay22
Pricing transparency1.04.5
Entry cost3.54.8
Implementation cost2.54.6
Hidden-fee risk3.04.7
Ongoing cost4.04.6

Affiliate.com pricing

Paid API access (pricing on request; trial for qualifying API customers) and web-app subscriptions; publishers keep 100% of the commissions paid directly by their networks.

Stay22 pricing

Free to use for publishers; operates on a performance-based revenue-share model where creators earn a commission on completed bookings.

What users say

Affiliate.com

8 positive · 5 neutral · 1 negative

Stay22

20 positive · 8 neutral · 5 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Affiliate.com scores 3.3 and Stay22 scores 3.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/affiliate-com/stay22, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Affiliate.com and Stay22 differ?

Affiliate.com is stronger on reporting & API (4.7 vs 2.4), product feeds & price comparison (4.6 vs 3.5) and merchant & programme coverage (4.6 vs 3.8). Stay22 is stronger on payment reliability & thresholds (3.9 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Affiliate.com or Stay22?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Affiliate.com scores 2.8/5 and Stay22 scores 4.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Affiliate.com or alternatives to Stay22.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.

Best For Lead GenWhat are the best affiliate networks for publishers focused...