Skip to main content

At a glance

  • Airship scores 3.3/5 and OneSignal scores 3.9/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent push notification services benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are integration effort & page speed (Airship 2.0, OneSignal 4.6) and privacy & compliance (Airship 4.7, OneSignal 3.5); they are within 0.3 on 5 of 10 criteria.
  • Airship is built for enterprise publishers; OneSignal for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Airship scores 1.4 and OneSignal 3.3 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 10 publishers use Airship and 61 use OneSignal.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Airship is stronger on privacy & compliance (4.7 vs 3.5), monetisation (2.0 vs 0.8) and analytics & attribution (4.5 vs 3.8).

OneSignal is stronger on integration effort & page speed (4.6 vs 2.0).

Which one fits

Choose Airship if…

  • You publish at enterprise scale.
  • You weight privacy & compliance, monetisation and analytics & attribution heavily — Airship leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose OneSignal if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight integration effort & page speed, delivery speed & reliability at scale and opt-in rate optimisation heavily — OneSignal leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Airship and OneSignal in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Push Notification Services.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAirshipOneSignal
Delivery speed & reliability at scale14% of capability4.04.5
Automation & triggers12% of capability4.84.6
Opt-in rate optimisation12% of capability4.34.5
Targeting & segmentation12% of capability4.84.7
Analytics & attribution10% of capability4.53.8
Integration effort & page speed8% of capability2.04.6
Monetisation8% of capability2.00.8
Platform coverage8% of capability4.84.8
Privacy & compliance8% of capability4.73.5
Rich content & formats8% of capability4.74.5
Capability45% of composite4.14.1
Publisher fit40% of composite3.04.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite1.43.3

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAirshipOneSignal
Pricing transparency1.03.5
Entry cost1.04.1
Implementation cost1.53.6
Hidden-fee risk2.42.2
Ongoing cost1.23.0

Airship pricing

Custom quote for the Airship Experience Platform (AXP); a self-service, no-code Airship Essentials plan is also available. Prices are not published.

OneSignal pricing

Free plan (10,000 web push subscribers per send, 1,000 mobile MAU); Growth from $19/month plus usage; Professional and Enterprise are custom-priced on annual contracts.

What users say

Airship

4 positive · 5 neutral · 0 negative

OneSignal

29 positive · 13 neutral · 9 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Airship scores 3.3 and OneSignal scores 3.9 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Push Notification Services benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/airship/onesignal, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Airship and OneSignal differ?

Airship is stronger on privacy & compliance (4.7 vs 3.5), monetisation (2.0 vs 0.8) and analytics & attribution (4.5 vs 3.8). OneSignal is stronger on integration effort & page speed (4.6 vs 2.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Airship or OneSignal?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Airship scores 1.4/5 and OneSignal scores 3.3/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Push Notification Services. See alternatives to Airship or alternatives to OneSignal.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Push Notification Services.

Find Better AlternativesWhich push notification tools are better suited for smaller...