Skip to main content

Airtable vs PublishPress

Last verified Oct 19, 2026

At a glance

  • Airtable scores 4.3/5 and PublishPress scores 3.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent editorial calendar software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are performance tracking (Airtable 2.8, PublishPress 1.2) and multi-channel planning (Airtable 4.0, PublishPress 2.8); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Airtable is built for small, mid-market and enterprise publishers; PublishPress for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Airtable scores 3.9 and PublishPress 4.7 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 6 publishers use Airtable and 2 use PublishPress.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Airtable is stronger on performance tracking (2.8 vs 1.2), multi-channel planning (4.0 vs 2.8), collaboration (4.3 vs 3.2) and implementation & support (3.8 vs 3.0).

Which one fits

Choose Airtable if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight performance tracking, multi-channel planning and collaboration heavily — Airtable leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose PublishPress if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight planning & scheduling views, editorial workflow & approvals and usability heavily — PublishPress leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Airtable and PublishPress in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAirtablePublishPress
Editorial workflow & approvals14% of capability4.44.7
Planning & scheduling views14% of capability4.24.6
CMS & publishing integrations12% of capability4.54.5
Collaboration12% of capability4.33.2
Custom fields & templates10% of capability4.84.2
Multi-channel planning10% of capability4.02.8
Performance tracking8% of capability2.81.2
Usability8% of capability4.24.4
Implementation & support6% of capability3.83.0
Permissions & security6% of capability4.54.6
Capability45% of composite4.23.8
Publisher fit40% of composite4.53.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.94.7

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAirtablePublishPress
Pricing transparency4.54.9
Entry cost4.84.8
Implementation cost4.04.7
Hidden-fee risk3.04.5
Ongoing cost3.24.8

Airtable pricing

Free tier available; Team plan at $20/seat/mo, Business plan at $45/seat/mo (billed annually), and custom Enterprise Scale pricing.

PublishPress pricing

Business $149/year (1 site); Agency $299/year (5 sites); Unlimited $499/year.

What users say

Airtable

15 positive · 31 neutral · 9 negative

PublishPress

2 positive · 5 neutral · 4 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Airtable scores 4.3 and PublishPress scores 3.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Editorial Calendar Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/airtable/publishpress, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Airtable and PublishPress differ?

Airtable is stronger on performance tracking (2.8 vs 1.2), multi-channel planning (4.0 vs 2.8), collaboration (4.3 vs 3.2) and implementation & support (3.8 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Airtable or PublishPress?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Airtable scores 3.9/5 and PublishPress scores 4.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to Airtable or alternatives to PublishPress.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Editorial Calendar Software.