Skip to main content

At a glance

  • Amazon Associates scores 4.0/5 and Skimlinks scores 4.3/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent affiliate networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are commission rates & payout terms (Amazon Associates 2.2, Skimlinks 3.2) and disclosure & compliance tools (Amazon Associates 3.5, Skimlinks 2.5); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Amazon Associates is built for small and mid-market publishers; Skimlinks for small, mid-market and enterprise.
  • On total cost of ownership Amazon Associates scores 4.2 and Skimlinks 4.0 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 14 publishers use Amazon Associates and 24 use Skimlinks; 2 run both.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Amazon Associates is stronger on disclosure & compliance tools (3.5 vs 2.5) and payment reliability & thresholds (3.8 vs 3.0).

Skimlinks is stronger on commission rates & payout terms (3.2 vs 2.2) and integration (4.5 vs 3.8).

Which one fits

Choose Amazon Associates if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight disclosure & compliance tools, payment reliability & thresholds and product feeds & price comparison heavily — Amazon Associates leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Skimlinks if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight commission rates & payout terms, integration and publisher approval & programme access heavily — Skimlinks leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Amazon Associates and Skimlinks in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Running both (2): PCWorld, MacRumors

Head to head

CriterionAmazon AssociatesSkimlinks
Commission rates & payout terms14% of capability2.23.2
Merchant & programme coverage14% of capability4.94.8
Tracking accuracy & attribution14% of capability4.24.2
Link automation & commerce content tools12% of capability4.54.8
Payment reliability & thresholds10% of capability3.83.0
Reporting & API10% of capability4.44.3
Product feeds & price comparison8% of capability4.33.7
Disclosure & compliance tools6% of capability3.52.5
Integration6% of capability3.84.5
Publisher approval & programme access6% of capability3.03.5
Capability45% of composite3.93.9
Publisher fit40% of composite4.04.9
Total cost of ownership15% of composite4.24.0

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAmazon AssociatesSkimlinks
Pricing transparency4.34.1
Entry cost4.44.5
Implementation cost4.04.2
Hidden-fee risk4.44.3
Ongoing cost3.93.0

Amazon Associates pricing

Free to join; performance-based commission model with rates typically between 1% and 20% depending on product category.

Skimlinks pricing

Free for publishers to join; operates on a 75/25 revenue share model where the publisher retains 75% of earned commissions.

What users say

Amazon Associates

25 positive · 23 neutral · 14 negative

Skimlinks

14 positive · 13 neutral · 7 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Amazon Associates scores 4.0 and Skimlinks scores 4.3 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/amazon-associates/skimlinks, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Amazon Associates and Skimlinks differ?

Amazon Associates is stronger on disclosure & compliance tools (3.5 vs 2.5) and payment reliability & thresholds (3.8 vs 3.0). Skimlinks is stronger on commission rates & payout terms (3.2 vs 2.2) and integration (4.5 vs 3.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Associates or Skimlinks?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Amazon Associates scores 4.2/5 and Skimlinks scores 4.0/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Amazon Associates or alternatives to Skimlinks.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.

Explore More NetworksWhat are the best alternatives to Skimlinks and Rakuten for...