Head to head · Best Payment Processing Platforms for Publishers
Authorize.net vs Worldpay
Authorize.net and Worldpay score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality.
| Criterion | Authorize.netLimited | WorldpayLimited |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.2 | 3.7— higher score for Worldpay |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.2— higher score for Authorize.net | 1.8 |
| Best for | Small, Mid-Market | Enterprise |
| Pricing | Gateway fee plus per-transaction | Interchange-plus, custom enterprise |
Common questions
Is Authorize.net or Worldpay better?
Authorize.net and Worldpay score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality. Authorize.net scores 2.3/5 and Worldpay scores 2.3/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.
Which is cheaper, Authorize.net or Worldpay?
On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Authorize.net scores 3.2/5 and Worldpay scores 1.8/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.
Still deciding?
Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Both tools are scored in Best Payment Processing Platforms for Publishers. See alternatives to Authorize.net or alternatives to Worldpay.
