Skip to main content

At a glance

  • AWeber scores 2.8/5 and beehiiv scores 4.2/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent email newsletter platforms benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are monetisation (AWeber 2.8, beehiiv 4.8) and analytics after apple mail privacy protection (AWeber 1.6, beehiiv 3.5); they are within 0.3 on 3 of 10 criteria.
  • AWeber is built for small publishers; beehiiv for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership AWeber scores 3.2 and beehiiv 4.5 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 3 publishers use AWeber and 17 use beehiiv.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

AWeber is stronger on integrations & API (4.2 vs 2.8).

beehiiv is stronger on monetisation (4.8 vs 2.8), analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection (3.5 vs 1.6) and audience growth tools (4.8 vs 3.2).

Which one fits

Choose AWeber if…

  • You publish at small scale.
  • You weight integrations & API, deliverability & inbox placement and compliance & list hygiene heavily — AWeber leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose beehiiv if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight monetisation, analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection and audience growth tools heavily — beehiiv leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to AWeber and beehiiv in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 7 scored tools are in Best Email Newsletter Platforms.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAWeberbeehiiv
Deliverability & inbox placement16% of capability4.63.5
Audience growth tools12% of capability3.24.8
Monetisation12% of capability2.84.8
Segmentation & automation12% of capability3.83.8
Analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection10% of capability1.63.5
Editor & template design10% of capability3.54.5
Integrations & API8% of capability4.22.8
Subscriber management & data portability8% of capability3.53.5
Compliance & list hygiene6% of capability3.53.0
Sending performance at scale6% of capability3.53.5
Capability45% of composite3.53.9
Publisher fit40% of composite2.04.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.24.5

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAWeberbeehiiv
Pricing transparency3.84.8
Entry cost3.94.7
Implementation cost3.84.6
Hidden-fee risk2.04.5
Ongoing cost2.43.8

AWeber pricing

Per-subscriber SaaS tiers

beehiiv pricing

Free plan for up to 2,500 subscribers; Lite from $49/month (up to 100,000 subscribers) and Pro from $95/month (up to 250,000), billed annually; custom Enterprise pricing.

What users say

AWeber

7 positive · 15 neutral · 10 negative

beehiiv

69 positive · 27 neutral · 16 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

AWeber scores 2.8 and beehiiv scores 4.2 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Email Newsletter Platforms benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/aweber/beehiiv, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do AWeber and beehiiv differ?

AWeber is stronger on integrations & API (4.2 vs 2.8). beehiiv is stronger on monetisation (4.8 vs 2.8), analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection (3.5 vs 1.6) and audience growth tools (4.8 vs 3.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, AWeber or beehiiv?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — AWeber scores 3.2/5 and beehiiv scores 4.5/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Email Newsletter Platforms. See alternatives to AWeber or alternatives to beehiiv.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Email Newsletter Platforms.

More AnswersQuestions? Try this one