Skip to main content

Head to head · Best Headless CMS Platforms

CoreMedia (Headless) vs Directus

CoreMedia (Headless) and Directus score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality.

CoreMedia (Headless) scores 2.5 out of 5 and Directus scores 2.6 out of 5, compared across overall score, capability, publisher fit, total cost of ownership, target market and pricing.
CriterionCoreMedia (Headless)LimitedDirectusLimited
Overall score2.52.6
Capability45% of composite4.4— higher score for CoreMedia (Headless)3.5
Publisher fit40% of composite1.01.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite0.94.3— higher score for Directus
Best forEnterpriseSmall, Mid-Market
PricingPremium enterprise licensingSelf-hosted Community Edition is free; Cloud plans start at $99/month for Standard, with Enterprise options available.

CoreMedia (Headless)

  • Unrivaled enterprise scalability
  • Hybrid headless flexibility
  • Powerful multi-site management
  • Very high TCO
  • Long implementation cycles
  • Overkill for simple sites
Full CoreMedia (Headless) review
Visit CoreMedia (Headless)

Directus

  • Strong headless data that works as the framework of content delivery
  • Compatible with any SQL database
  • No-code Admin App makes content editing easy for non-technical teams
  • Not suitable for the editorial workflow of newsrooms
Full Directus review
Visit Directus

Common questions

Is CoreMedia (Headless) or Directus better?

CoreMedia (Headless) and Directus score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality. CoreMedia (Headless) scores 2.5/5 and Directus scores 2.6/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.

Which is cheaper, CoreMedia (Headless) or Directus?

On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — CoreMedia (Headless) scores 0.9/5 and Directus scores 4.3/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.

Still deciding?

Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.

Another SideFlip your perspective