Head to head · Best Subscription Management Platforms
FatChilli (REMP) vs Recurly
FatChilli (REMP) scores higher overall (3.6 vs 3.4), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you.
| Criterion | FatChilli (REMP)Fair Fit | RecurlyFair Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 3.6— higher score for FatChilli (REMP) | 3.4 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.2 | 3.6— higher score for Recurly |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.5— higher score for FatChilli (REMP) | 3.5 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Best for | Mid-Market | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Pricing | Free open-source; Managed fees via FatChilli | Core plan starts at $249/mo plus 0.9% of billing volume; Professional and Elite tiers require custom enterprise quotes. |
FatChilli (REMP)
- Subscription-first design
- Open-source flexibility
- Granular reader analytics
- Steep learning curve
- High technical overhead
- Limited developer community
Recurly
- Easy-to-run and automated recurring billing model
- Customer support team ready to solve any issues
- 12-month promotional offer for new Core sign-ups
- Some customization features require the user to code
- Limited native CMS/paywall integrations
- Pricing transparency issues at scale
Common questions
Is FatChilli (REMP) or Recurly better?
FatChilli (REMP) scores higher overall (3.6 vs 3.4), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you. FatChilli (REMP) scores 3.6/5 and Recurly scores 3.4/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.
Which is cheaper, FatChilli (REMP) or Recurly?
On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — FatChilli (REMP) scores 2.5/5 and Recurly scores 2.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.
Still deciding?
Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Both tools are scored in Best Subscription Management Platforms. See alternatives to FatChilli (REMP) or alternatives to Recurly.
