Head to head · Best Ad Networks for Publishers
Freestar vs MonetizeMore
MonetizeMore scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.8), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you.
| Criterion | FreestarStrong Choice | MonetizeMoreStrong Choice |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 3.8 | 4.1— higher score for MonetizeMore |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.6 | 4.0— higher score for MonetizeMore |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 2.2 | 3.2— higher score for MonetizeMore |
| Best for | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Pricing | Operates on a transparent revenue-share model; custom enterprise pricing typically requires a minimum of 1M to 5M monthly pageviews and 12 months of historical traffic data. | Revenue-share model based on ad revenue uplift; full-service qualification requires at least $5,000 in monthly ad revenue, with lower entry tiers available for narrower products. |
Freestar
- Dedicated audience development team
- World-class yield management experts provide ongoing optimization
- NET 60 payment schedule via Tipalti or PayPal
- High traffic requirement (1M+ monthly pageviews and 12 months of history) excludes smaller publishers
- Moderate script overhead
MonetizeMore
- Publishers typically see 50-300% revenue increases compared to AdSense alone
- Full-service approach with hands-on ad ops support and custom optimization strategies
- No contract lock-ins with a 30-day termination notice period
- Full-service eligibility requires at least $5,000 in monthly ad revenue, which limits smaller publishers
- Revenue performance is heavily dependent on the quality and responsiveness of the assigned ad ops support team
- Takes a revenue share that is competitive with managed-service alternatives
Common questions
Is Freestar or MonetizeMore better?
MonetizeMore scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.8), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you. Freestar scores 3.8/5 and MonetizeMore scores 4.1/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.
Which is cheaper, Freestar or MonetizeMore?
On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Freestar scores 2.2/5 and MonetizeMore scores 3.2/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.
Still deciding?
Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Both tools are scored in Best Ad Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Freestar or alternatives to MonetizeMore.