Skip to main content

Head to head · Best Ad Networks for Publishers

Freestar vs PubMatic

Freestar and PubMatic score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality.

Freestar scores 3.8 out of 5 and PubMatic scores 3.8 out of 5, compared across overall score, capability, publisher fit, total cost of ownership, target market and pricing.
CriterionFreestarStrong ChoicePubMaticStrong Choice
Overall score3.83.8
Capability45% of composite3.63.6
Publisher fit40% of composite4.54.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.22.3
Best forMid-Market, EnterpriseMid-Market, Enterprise
PricingOperates on a transparent revenue-share model; custom enterprise pricing typically requires a minimum of 1M to 5M monthly pageviews and 12 months of historical traffic data.Revenue share, taken from auction proceeds

Freestar

  • Dedicated audience development team
  • World-class yield management experts provide ongoing optimization
  • NET 60 payment schedule via Tipalti or PayPal
  • High traffic requirement (1M+ monthly pageviews and 12 months of history) excludes smaller publishers
  • Moderate script overhead
Full Freestar review
Visit Freestar

PubMatic

  • Owns infrastructure rather than renting cloud capacity
  • Publicly traded with disclosed financials
  • Broad CTV and mobile format support
  • Smaller demand pool than some larger competitors
  • Advanced features may need dedicated account support
Full PubMatic review
Visit PubMatic

Common questions

Is Freestar or PubMatic better?

Freestar and PubMatic score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality. Freestar scores 3.8/5 and PubMatic scores 3.8/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.

Which is cheaper, Freestar or PubMatic?

On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Freestar scores 2.2/5 and PubMatic scores 2.3/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.

Still deciding?

Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.

Next UpPerfect follow-up read