Skip to main content

Freestar vs Raptive (AdThrive)

Publishers running both: 2

Last verified Nov 11, 2026

At a glance

  • Freestar scores 3.8/5 and Raptive (AdThrive) scores 3.9/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent ad networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are payment terms & reliability (Freestar 2.5, Raptive (AdThrive) 3.8) and eligibility & onboarding (Freestar 1.5, Raptive (AdThrive) 2.5); they are within 0.3 on 5 of 10 criteria.
  • Freestar is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Raptive (AdThrive) for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Freestar scores 2.2 and Raptive (AdThrive) 2.7 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 39 publishers use Freestar and 25 use Raptive (AdThrive); 2 run both.
  • Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Freestar is stronger on publisher control & transparency (3.0 vs 2.2).

Raptive (AdThrive) is stronger on payment terms & reliability (3.8 vs 2.5), eligibility & onboarding (2.5 vs 1.5) and page speed & Core Web Vitals impact (3.5 vs 3.0).

Which one fits

Choose Freestar if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight publisher control & transparency, demand access & header bidding and integration & ad-ops workload heavily — Freestar leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Raptive (AdThrive) if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight payment terms & reliability, eligibility & onboarding and page speed & Core Web Vitals impact heavily — Raptive (AdThrive) leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Freestar and Raptive (AdThrive) in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 36 scored tools are in Best Ad Networks for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Running both (2): App Developer Magazine, Running Shoes Guru

Head to head

CriterionFreestarRaptive (AdThrive)
Revenue yield & RPM uplift16% of capability4.64.6
Demand access & header bidding14% of capability4.74.4
Ad quality & brand safety controls12% of capability4.54.5
Publisher control & transparency12% of capability3.02.2
Page speed & Core Web Vitals impact10% of capability3.03.5
Payment terms & reliability10% of capability2.53.8
Integration & ad-ops workload8% of capability4.54.3
Reporting & reconciliation8% of capability3.54.0
Consent & privacy readiness5% of capability3.53.6
Eligibility & onboarding5% of capability1.52.5
Capability45% of composite3.73.9
Publisher fit40% of composite4.54.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.22.7

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreFreestarRaptive (AdThrive)
Pricing transparency1.32.6
Entry cost0.91.7
Implementation cost2.62.6
Hidden-fee risk3.63.9
Ongoing cost2.62.6

Freestar pricing

Operates on a transparent revenue-share model; custom enterprise pricing typically requires a minimum of 1M to 5M monthly pageviews and 12 months of historical traffic data.

Raptive (AdThrive) pricing

75/25 revenue share model (75% to publisher); requires 25,000+ monthly pageviews for entry (lowered from 100,000).

What users say

Freestar

10 positive · 9 neutral · 2 negative

Raptive (AdThrive)

7 positive · 4 neutral · 0 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Freestar scores 3.8 and Raptive (AdThrive) scores 3.9 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Ad Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/freestar/raptive-adthrive, verified Nov 11, 2026)

Common questions

How do Freestar and Raptive (AdThrive) differ?

Freestar is stronger on publisher control & transparency (3.0 vs 2.2). Raptive (AdThrive) is stronger on payment terms & reliability (3.8 vs 2.5), eligibility & onboarding (2.5 vs 1.5) and page speed & Core Web Vitals impact (3.5 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Freestar or Raptive (AdThrive)?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Freestar scores 2.2/5 and Raptive (AdThrive) scores 2.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Ad Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Freestar or alternatives to Raptive (AdThrive).

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Ad Networks for Publishers.

Ad Network InsightsWhich ad network is better for lifestyle content?