Head to head · Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools
Google Trends vs Muck Rack
Google Trends and Muck Rack score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality.
| Criterion | Google TrendsLimited | Muck RackLimited |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Capability45% of composite | 2.6 | 3.6— higher score for Muck Rack |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 4.9— higher score for Google Trends | 2.0 |
| Best for | Small, Mid-Market | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Pricing | Free to use; the standard web interface and search interest data are available at no cost. | Custom annual contracts only; Starter tiers from $5,000/yr, Standard $10,000-$15,000/yr, and Premier $20,000-$50,000+/yr. |
Google Trends
- Intuitive interface, accessible for individuals with varying levels of technical expertise
- Beneficial for identifying trending keywords and aiding content creation and SEO strategies
- Assists content creators in developing relevant and timely material
- Data provided is not detailed enough for in-depth analysis
- May not offer explanations for sudden spikes or drops in search patterns, requiring independent interpretation
Muck Rack
- Intuitive interface simplifies navigation and enhances user experience
- Access to a vast and up-to-date database of journalists and media outlets, facilitating targeted outreach
- Suite of tools including media monitoring, social listening, and customizable reporting for effective campaign management
- Occasional inaccuracies in the media database, which can affect the precision of outreach efforts
- Limited coverage in specific areas may require supplementing with additional tools
Common questions
Is Google Trends or Muck Rack better?
Google Trends and Muck Rack score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality. Google Trends scores 2.7/5 and Muck Rack scores 2.7/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.
Which is cheaper, Google Trends or Muck Rack?
On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Google Trends scores 4.9/5 and Muck Rack scores 2.0/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.
Still deciding?
Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Both tools are scored in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools. See alternatives to Google Trends or alternatives to Muck Rack.
