Skip to main content

At a glance

  • Impact scores 3.9/5 and Skimlinks scores 4.3/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent affiliate networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are disclosure & compliance tools (Impact 4.4, Skimlinks 2.5) and product feeds & price comparison (Impact 4.5, Skimlinks 3.7); they are within 0.3 on 6 of 10 criteria.
  • Impact is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Skimlinks for small, mid-market and enterprise.
  • On total cost of ownership Impact scores 4.2 and Skimlinks 4.0 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 3 publishers use Impact and 24 use Skimlinks.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Impact is stronger on disclosure & compliance tools (4.4 vs 2.5), product feeds & price comparison (4.5 vs 3.7), tracking accuracy & attribution (4.7 vs 4.2) and reporting & API (4.7 vs 4.3).

Which one fits

Choose Impact if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight disclosure & compliance tools, product feeds & price comparison and tracking accuracy & attribution heavily — Impact leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Skimlinks if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight integration, merchant & programme coverage and payment reliability & thresholds heavily — Skimlinks leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Impact and Skimlinks in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionImpactSkimlinks
Commission rates & payout terms14% of capability3.23.2
Merchant & programme coverage14% of capability4.64.8
Tracking accuracy & attribution14% of capability4.74.2
Link automation & commerce content tools12% of capability4.84.8
Payment reliability & thresholds10% of capability2.83.0
Reporting & API10% of capability4.74.3
Product feeds & price comparison8% of capability4.53.7
Disclosure & compliance tools6% of capability4.42.5
Integration6% of capability4.24.5
Publisher approval & programme access6% of capability3.83.5
Capability45% of composite4.23.9
Publisher fit40% of composite3.54.9
Total cost of ownership15% of composite4.24.0

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreImpactSkimlinks
Pricing transparency4.34.1
Entry cost4.84.5
Implementation cost4.04.2
Hidden-fee risk3.54.3
Ongoing cost4.33.0

Impact pricing

Free for publishers and partners to join; brand plans are Starter $30/mo + 2.5% of revenue, Essentials $500/mo, Pro $2,500/mo and Enterprise $10,000/mo.

Skimlinks pricing

Free for publishers to join; operates on a 75/25 revenue share model where the publisher retains 75% of earned commissions.

What users say

Impact

0 positive · 0 neutral · 1 negative

Skimlinks

14 positive · 13 neutral · 7 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Impact scores 3.9 and Skimlinks scores 4.3 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/impact/skimlinks, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Impact and Skimlinks differ?

Impact is stronger on disclosure & compliance tools (4.4 vs 2.5), product feeds & price comparison (4.5 vs 3.7), tracking accuracy & attribution (4.7 vs 4.2) and reporting & API (4.7 vs 4.3). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Impact or Skimlinks?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Impact scores 4.2/5 and Skimlinks scores 4.0/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Impact or alternatives to Skimlinks.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.

Explore More AlternativesWhich affiliate networks are the best alternatives to Skimli...