Impact vs Stay22
Impact
Comprehensive partnership management platform for automating affiliate, influencer, and creator growth
Publishers using it: 3 · incl. Community Impact, Taylor Hart
Stay22
AI-powered monetization platform helping publishers and creators turn travel intent into booking revenue.
Publishers using it: 12 · incl. Liverpool Echo, Lonely Planet, Daily Mirror
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Impact scores 3.9/5 and Stay22 scores 3.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent affiliate networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are disclosure & compliance tools (Impact 4.4, Stay22 1.8) and reporting & api (Impact 4.7, Stay22 2.4); they are within 0.3 on 2 of 10 criteria.
- Impact is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Stay22 for small and mid-market.
- On total cost of ownership Impact scores 4.2 and Stay22 4.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 3 publishers use Impact and 12 use Stay22.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Impact is stronger on disclosure & compliance tools (4.4 vs 1.8), reporting & API (4.7 vs 2.4) and tracking accuracy & attribution (4.7 vs 3.2).
Stay22 is stronger on payment reliability & thresholds (3.9 vs 2.8).
Which one fits
Choose Impact if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight disclosure & compliance tools, reporting & API and tracking accuracy & attribution heavily — Impact leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Stay22 if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight payment reliability & thresholds and commission rates & payout terms heavily — Stay22 leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Impact and Stay22 in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 4.0Amazon AssociatesThe world's largest affiliate marketing program providing creators and publishers global product monetizationRead review
- 3.8AwinA global affiliate marketing platform connecting publishers with diverse advertisers to drive performanceRead review
- 3.7CJ.comA global affiliate marketing network connecting publishers with premium brand advertisersRead review
- 3.8RakutenA global performance marketing network connecting brands with premium publishers via affiliate and media solutions, in a strategic alliance with impact.com (April 2026).Read review
All 12 scored tools are in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Head to head
| Criterion | Impact | Stay22 |
|---|---|---|
| Commission rates & payout terms14% of capability | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| Merchant & programme coverage14% of capability | 4.6 | 3.8 |
| Tracking accuracy & attribution14% of capability | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Link automation & commerce content tools12% of capability | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Payment reliability & thresholds10% of capability | 2.8 | 3.9 |
| Reporting & API10% of capability | 4.7 | 2.4 |
| Product feeds & price comparison8% of capability | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Disclosure & compliance tools6% of capability | 4.4 | 1.8 |
| Integration6% of capability | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Publisher approval & programme access6% of capability | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| Capability45% of composite | 4.2 | 3.4 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Impact | Stay22 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Entry cost | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Implementation cost | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| Ongoing cost | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Impact pricing
Free for publishers and partners to join; brand plans are Starter $30/mo + 2.5% of revenue, Essentials $500/mo, Pro $2,500/mo and Enterprise $10,000/mo.
Stay22 pricing
Free to use for publishers; operates on a performance-based revenue-share model where creators earn a commission on completed bookings.
What users say
Impact
0 positive · 0 neutral · 1 negative
Stay22
20 positive · 8 neutral · 5 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Impact scores 3.9 and Stay22 scores 3.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/impact/stay22, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Impact and Stay22 differ?
Impact is stronger on disclosure & compliance tools (4.4 vs 1.8), reporting & API (4.7 vs 2.4) and tracking accuracy & attribution (4.7 vs 3.2). Stay22 is stronger on payment reliability & thresholds (3.9 vs 2.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Impact or Stay22?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Impact scores 4.2/5 and Stay22 scores 4.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Impact or alternatives to Stay22.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Four questions, and a scored stack across every benchmark — not just Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers
Every scored tool in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers, with the criteria behind each number
Every category, independently scored
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.
