Kordiam vs Lytho
Kordiam
Professional newsroom planning and editorial calendar platform for complex multi-channel workflows
Publishers using it: 5 · incl. Handelsblatt Media Group, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Erdee Media Groep
Last verified Nov 11, 2026
At a glance
- Kordiam scores 4.1/5 and Lytho scores 2.9/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent editorial calendar software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are permissions & security (Kordiam 3.8, Lytho 4.6) and usability (Kordiam 2.8, Lytho 3.4); they are within 0.3 on 7 of 10 criteria.
- Both are built for mid-market and enterprise publishers.
- On total cost of ownership Kordiam scores 3.2 and Lytho 1.8 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 5 publishers use Kordiam and 3 use Lytho.
- Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Kordiam is stronger on CMS & publishing integrations (4.6 vs 4.2).
Lytho is stronger on permissions & security (4.6 vs 3.8), usability (3.4 vs 2.8) and custom fields & templates (4.5 vs 4.3).
Which one fits
Choose Kordiam if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight CMS & publishing integrations, performance tracking and multi-channel planning heavily — Kordiam leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Lytho if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight permissions & security, usability and custom fields & templates heavily — Lytho leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Kordiam and Lytho in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 4.0AsanaAI-powered work management platform orchestrating complex editorial workflows and multi-channel content campaignsRead review
- 3.5MultiCollabGoogle Docs-style real-time collaboration and editorial commenting directly within the WordPress block editorRead review
- 3.8PublishPressProfessional editorial, permission, and workflow management tools for WordPress content teams and digital publishers.Read review
- 3.1StoryChiefA centralized platform to plan, create, and distribute content across multiple channels with AI-driven optimization.Read review
All 12 scored tools are in Best Editorial Calendar Software.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Head to head
| Criterion | Kordiam | Lytho |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial workflow & approvals14% of capability | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Planning & scheduling views14% of capability | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CMS & publishing integrations12% of capability | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Collaboration12% of capability | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Custom fields & templates10% of capability | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Multi-channel planning10% of capability | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Performance tracking8% of capability | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Usability8% of capability | 2.8 | 3.4 |
| Implementation & support6% of capability | 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Permissions & security6% of capability | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Capability45% of composite | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.2 | 1.8 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Kordiam | Lytho |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.5 | 1.0 |
| Entry cost | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| Implementation cost | 3.0 | 1.5 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Ongoing cost | 3.0 | 2.3 |
Kordiam pricing
Tiered pricing by team size rather than per seat, shown per month: Extra-Small (up to 5 users) $237/month billed yearly ($263 monthly) up to Large (41-60 users) $1,125/month billed yearly; Enterprise quoted. An optional Support & Security package adds about 40%.
Lytho pricing
Custom enterprise pricing via quote; plans are tiered as Standard (10 users), Professional (25 users), and Enterprise (100+ users). Third-party data indicates specialized seats may start around $79/user/month.
What users say
Kordiam
5 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative
Lytho
10 positive · 2 neutral · 0 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Kordiam scores 4.1 and Lytho scores 2.9 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Editorial Calendar Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/kordiam/lytho-formerly-lytho-planner, verified Nov 11, 2026)
Common questions
How do Kordiam and Lytho differ?
Kordiam is stronger on CMS & publishing integrations (4.6 vs 4.2). Lytho is stronger on permissions & security (4.6 vs 3.8), usability (3.4 vs 2.8) and custom fields & templates (4.5 vs 4.3). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Kordiam or Lytho?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Kordiam scores 3.2/5 and Lytho scores 1.8/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to Kordiam or alternatives to Lytho.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Editorial Calendar Software.
