Skip to main content

At a glance

  • Kordiam scores 4.1/5 and StoryChief scores 3.1/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent editorial calendar software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are performance tracking (Kordiam 2.2, StoryChief 4.0) and usability (Kordiam 2.8, StoryChief 4.4); they are within 0.3 on 5 of 10 criteria.
  • Kordiam is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; StoryChief for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Kordiam scores 3.2 and StoryChief 4.0 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 5 publishers use Kordiam and 2 use StoryChief.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Kordiam is stronger on editorial workflow & approvals (4.7 vs 4.2) and permissions & security (3.8 vs 3.3).

StoryChief is stronger on performance tracking (4.0 vs 2.2) and usability (4.4 vs 2.8).

Which one fits

Choose Kordiam if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight editorial workflow & approvals, permissions & security and collaboration heavily — Kordiam leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose StoryChief if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight performance tracking, usability and CMS & publishing integrations heavily — StoryChief leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Kordiam and StoryChief in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionKordiamStoryChief
Editorial workflow & approvals14% of capability4.74.2
Planning & scheduling views14% of capability4.64.6
CMS & publishing integrations12% of capability4.64.8
Collaboration12% of capability4.44.0
Custom fields & templates10% of capability4.34.0
Multi-channel planning10% of capability4.64.7
Performance tracking8% of capability2.24.0
Usability8% of capability2.84.4
Implementation & support6% of capability3.53.5
Permissions & security6% of capability3.83.3
Capability45% of composite4.14.2
Publisher fit40% of composite4.51.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.24.0

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreKordiamStoryChief
Pricing transparency4.54.8
Entry cost2.53.5
Implementation cost3.04.2
Hidden-fee risk3.04.0
Ongoing cost3.03.5

Kordiam pricing

Tiered pricing by team size rather than per seat, shown per month: Extra-Small (up to 5 users) $237/month billed yearly ($263 monthly) up to Large (41-60 users) $1,125/month billed yearly; Enterprise quoted. An optional Support & Security package adds about 40%.

StoryChief pricing

Free trial available; Starter $59/month billed yearly ($69 monthly), Growth $279/month, Scale $449/month and Agency $81/month per workspace (yearly prices); Enterprise from EUR 1,000+/month.

What users say

Kordiam

5 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative

StoryChief

5 positive · 3 neutral · 1 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Kordiam scores 4.1 and StoryChief scores 3.1 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Editorial Calendar Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/kordiam/storychief, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Kordiam and StoryChief differ?

Kordiam is stronger on editorial workflow & approvals (4.7 vs 4.2) and permissions & security (3.8 vs 3.3). StoryChief is stronger on performance tracking (4.0 vs 2.2) and usability (4.4 vs 2.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Kordiam or StoryChief?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Kordiam scores 3.2/5 and StoryChief scores 4.0/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to Kordiam or alternatives to StoryChief.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Head to HeadWhat are the key differences in features between Kordiam and...