Skip to main content

LinkedIn Publishing vs Medium

Last verified Nov 11, 2026

At a glance

  • LinkedIn Publishing scores 3.3/5 and Medium scores 3.2/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent content syndication platforms benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are revenue model & payout terms (LinkedIn Publishing 1.0, Medium 3.8) and content control & rights (LinkedIn Publishing 1.6, Medium 3.2); they are within 0.3 on 5 of 10 criteria.
  • LinkedIn Publishing is built for small and mid-market publishers; Medium for small.
  • On total cost of ownership LinkedIn Publishing scores 4.5 and Medium 4.7 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 0 publishers use LinkedIn Publishing and 1 use Medium.
  • Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

LinkedIn Publishing is stronger on referral traffic quality (2.2 vs 1.8).

Medium is stronger on revenue model & payout terms (3.8 vs 1.0), content control & rights (3.2 vs 1.6) and commercial terms transparency (3.0 vs 2.5).

Which one fits

Choose LinkedIn Publishing if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight referral traffic quality, performance analytics and onboarding effort heavily — LinkedIn Publishing leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Medium if…

  • You publish at small scale.
  • You weight revenue model & payout terms, content control & rights and commercial terms transparency heavily — Medium leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to LinkedIn Publishing and Medium in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 10 scored tools are in Best Content Syndication Platforms.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

LinkedIn Publishing · 0

No publisher adoption verified yet.

Medium · 1

Head to head

CriterionLinkedIn PublishingMedium
Distribution reach & partner network14% of capability4.64.6
Revenue model & payout terms14% of capability1.03.8
Content control & rights12% of capability1.63.2
Referral traffic quality12% of capability2.21.8
Feed formats & integration10% of capability1.51.7
Performance analytics10% of capability3.83.5
Brand safety & compliance8% of capability4.24.2
Targeting & placement8% of capability2.42.8
Commercial terms transparency6% of capability2.53.0
Onboarding effort6% of capability4.74.5
Capability45% of composite2.73.3
Publisher fit40% of composite3.52.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite4.54.7

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreLinkedIn PublishingMedium
Pricing transparency4.54.5
Entry cost4.94.9
Implementation cost4.94.8
Hidden-fee risk4.54.5
Ongoing cost3.84.6

LinkedIn Publishing pricing

Free to publish for all members and Pages; Premium plans optional.

Medium pricing

Free to publish; Reader memberships cost $5/month or $50/year; 'Friend of Medium' tier available for $15/month.

What users say

LinkedIn Publishing

4 positive · 6 neutral · 3 negative

Medium

6 positive · 6 neutral · 7 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

LinkedIn Publishing scores 3.3 and Medium scores 3.2 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Content Syndication Platforms benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/linkedin-publishing/medium, verified Nov 11, 2026)

Common questions

How do LinkedIn Publishing and Medium differ?

LinkedIn Publishing is stronger on referral traffic quality (2.2 vs 1.8). Medium is stronger on revenue model & payout terms (3.8 vs 1.0), content control & rights (3.2 vs 1.6) and commercial terms transparency (3.0 vs 2.5). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, LinkedIn Publishing or Medium?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — LinkedIn Publishing scores 4.5/5 and Medium scores 4.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Content Syndication Platforms. See alternatives to LinkedIn Publishing or alternatives to Medium.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Content Syndication Platforms.

Explore AlternativesWhich alternatives to Flatplan and Medium should I consider?