Skip to main content

Magazine Manager vs RunMags

Last verified Nov 12, 2026

At a glance

  • Magazine Manager scores 3.8/5 and RunMags scores 3.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent CRM solutions benchmark, both assessed on the same 11 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are workflow automation (Magazine Manager 3.0, RunMags 4.5) and implementation & migration (Magazine Manager 2.6, RunMags 4.0); they are within 0.3 on 6 of 11 criteria.
  • Both are built for small and mid-market publishers.
  • On total cost of ownership Magazine Manager scores 2.2 and RunMags 3.3 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 3 publishers use Magazine Manager and 1 use RunMags.
  • Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Magazine Manager is stronger on sales reporting & forecasting (4.0 vs 2.8).

RunMags is stronger on workflow automation (4.5 vs 3.0), implementation & migration (4.0 vs 2.6) and order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.7 vs 4.2).

Which one fits

Choose Magazine Manager if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight sales reporting & forecasting and reader & subscriber relationship data heavily — Magazine Manager leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose RunMags if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight workflow automation, implementation & migration and order-to-invoice & ad server integration heavily — RunMags leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Magazine Manager and RunMags in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 8 scored tools are in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionMagazine ManagerRunMags
Media sales pipeline & proposals14% of capability4.64.6
Advertiser & agency account management12% of capability3.53.5
Integrations12% of capability2.83.2
Order-to-invoice & ad server integration12% of capability4.24.7
Reader & subscriber relationship data10% of capability4.03.8
Sales reporting & forecasting10% of capability4.02.8
Sales team usability8% of capability2.83.0
Workflow automation8% of capability3.04.5
Implementation & migration6% of capability2.64.0
Data security & permissions4% of capability3.53.5
Mobile & field sales4% of capability3.53.5
Capability45% of composite3.63.8
Publisher fit40% of composite4.54.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.23.3

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreMagazine ManagerRunMags
Pricing transparency1.23.5
Entry cost1.22.5
Implementation cost1.72.0
Hidden-fee risk3.54.5
Ongoing cost3.54.0

Magazine Manager pricing

Custom pricing; quotes are provided based on the number of users, titles managed, and specific modules required.

RunMags pricing

Pro plan EUR 399/month. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)

What users say

Magazine Manager

6 positive · 3 neutral · 2 negative

RunMags

3 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Magazine Manager scores 3.8 and RunMags scores 3.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best CRM Solutions for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/magazine-manager/runmags, verified Nov 12, 2026)

Common questions

How do Magazine Manager and RunMags differ?

Magazine Manager is stronger on sales reporting & forecasting (4.0 vs 2.8). RunMags is stronger on workflow automation (4.5 vs 3.0), implementation & migration (4.0 vs 2.6) and order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.7 vs 4.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Magazine Manager or RunMags?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Magazine Manager scores 2.2/5 and RunMags scores 3.3/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (11 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers. See alternatives to Magazine Manager or alternatives to RunMags.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.

Another SideWhat are the key differences in publisher fit between Magazi...