Skip to main content

MagCast vs MobiLoud

Last verified Nov 12, 2026

At a glance

  • MagCast scores 3.5/5 and MobiLoud scores 3.7/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent mobile magazine apps benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are integrations & api (MagCast 2.0, MobiLoud 3.8) and app store compliance & updates (MagCast 3.0, MobiLoud 4.7).
  • MagCast is built for small publishers; MobiLoud for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership MagCast scores 3.0 and MobiLoud 2.7 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 1 publishers use MagCast and 7 use MobiLoud.
  • Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

MagCast is stronger on monetisation (4.5 vs 3.2).

MobiLoud is stronger on integrations & API (3.8 vs 2.0), app store compliance & updates (4.7 vs 3.0) and content management & publishing workflow (4.6 vs 3.2).

Which one fits

Choose MagCast if…

  • You publish at small scale.
  • You weight monetisation, security & privacy and analytics heavily — MagCast leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose MobiLoud if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight integrations & API, app store compliance & updates and content management & publishing workflow heavily — MobiLoud leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to MagCast and MobiLoud in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 6 scored tools are in Best Mobile Magazine Apps.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionMagCastMobiLoud
Monetisation14% of capability4.53.2
Reader experience14% of capability3.24.2
Content management & publishing workflow12% of capability3.24.6
Analytics10% of capability2.82.4
Entitlements & subscription integration10% of capability2.53.0
Platform coverage10% of capability4.04.5
App store compliance & updates8% of capability3.04.7
Integrations & API8% of capability2.03.8
Push & engagement tools8% of capability3.84.4
Security & privacy6% of capability2.52.0
Capability45% of composite3.33.7
Publisher fit40% of composite4.04.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.02.7

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreMagCastMobiLoud
Pricing transparency3.04.5
Entry cost2.51.0
Implementation cost2.93.0
Hidden-fee risk3.92.5
Ongoing cost3.02.5

MagCast pricing

From under $250/mo; the membership includes one magazine title, iOS and Android apps and a one-year term.

MobiLoud pricing

Growth $799/mo (5,000 MAU, $100 per extra 1,000), Business $1,499/mo (10,000 MAU, $50 per extra 1,000), Enterprise custom; 15% off annual billing; OneSignal and app store developer accounts billed separately.

What users say

MagCast

2 positive · 1 neutral · 0 negative

MobiLoud

5 positive · 8 neutral · 2 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

MagCast scores 3.5 and MobiLoud scores 3.7 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Mobile Magazine Apps benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/magcast/mobiloud, verified Nov 12, 2026)

Common questions

How do MagCast and MobiLoud differ?

MagCast is stronger on monetisation (4.5 vs 3.2). MobiLoud is stronger on integrations & API (3.8 vs 2.0), app store compliance & updates (4.7 vs 3.0) and content management & publishing workflow (4.6 vs 3.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, MagCast or MobiLoud?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — MagCast scores 3.0/5 and MobiLoud scores 2.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Mobile Magazine Apps. See alternatives to MagCast or alternatives to MobiLoud.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Mobile Magazine Apps.

Go DeeperWhat are the main differences in their push and engagement t...