Head to head · Best Ad Networks for Publishers
Media.net vs Raptive (AdThrive)
Media.net scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.9), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you.
| Criterion | Media.netStrong Choice | Raptive (AdThrive)Strong Choice |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 4.1— higher score for Media.net | 3.9 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.8 | 3.7 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.8— higher score for Media.net | 2.7 |
| Best for | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Small, Mid-Market |
| Pricing | Free for publishers to join; operates on a revenue-share model where the platform takes a percentage of ad earnings. | 75/25 revenue share model (75% to publisher); requires 25,000+ monthly pageviews for entry (lowered from 100,000). |
Media.net
- Unmatched search demand
- Smooth approval process as compared to Google AdSense
- Dedicated account manager provides hands-on optimization support
- Performance heavily dependent on tier-1 geographic traffic
- Weak performance on generic content
Raptive (AdThrive)
- Publisher payment guarantee independent of advertisers' non-payment
- Strong performance and high RPMs for lifestyle content
- Strong user experience that strengthens credibility
- Best for lifestyle niches; may underperform in other verticals
- Geographic restrictions favour Tier 1 countries
- Demands users to exhibit commitment by exclusively sticking to their ads
Common questions
Is Media.net or Raptive (AdThrive) better?
Media.net scores higher overall (4.1 vs 3.9), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you. Media.net scores 4.1/5 and Raptive (AdThrive) scores 3.9/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.
Which is cheaper, Media.net or Raptive (AdThrive)?
On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Media.net scores 3.8/5 and Raptive (AdThrive) scores 2.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.
Still deciding?
Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Both tools are scored in Best Ad Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Media.net or alternatives to Raptive (AdThrive).
