Pipedrive vs RunMags
Pipedrive
A sales-first CRM designed to streamline deal management through intuitive visual pipelines and AI-driven automation.
Publishers using it: 1
RunMags
An all-in-one business management platform built to streamline ad sales, production, and billing for media publishers.
Publishers using it: 1 · incl. Florida Country Magazine
Last verified Nov 11, 2026
At a glance
- Pipedrive scores 2.5/5 and RunMags scores 3.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent CRM solutions benchmark, both assessed on the same 11 criteria.
- The widest gaps are order-to-invoice & ad server integration (Pipedrive 1.5, RunMags 4.7) and reader & subscriber relationship data (Pipedrive 2.2, RunMags 3.8); they are within 0.3 on 1 of 11 criteria.
- Both are built for small and mid-market publishers.
- On total cost of ownership Pipedrive scores 4.3 and RunMags 3.3 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 1 publishers use Pipedrive and 1 use RunMags.
- Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Pipedrive is stronger on sales team usability (4.6 vs 3.0).
RunMags is stronger on order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.7 vs 1.5), reader & subscriber relationship data (3.8 vs 2.2) and media sales pipeline & proposals (4.6 vs 3.2).
Which one fits
Choose Pipedrive if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight sales team usability, integrations and mobile & field sales heavily — Pipedrive leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose RunMags if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight order-to-invoice & ad server integration, reader & subscriber relationship data and media sales pipeline & proposals heavily — RunMags leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Pipedrive and RunMags in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 3.7LaunchPad Media MgmtA specialized media CRM streamlining advertising sales and production workflows for publishersRead review
- 3.8Magazine ManagerAn end-to-end publishing CRM and ERP for media sales, production, and accountingRead review
- 3.9Salesforce for MediaAI-powered CRM platform for managing cross-channel advertising sales and subscriber lifecycles at enterprise scale.Read review
- 3.4WorkbooksA unified CRM and business management platform designed to streamline sales, marketing, and order processing for mid-market organizations.Read review
All 8 scored tools are in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Pipedrive · 1
RunMags · 1
Head to head
| Criterion | Pipedrive | RunMags |
|---|---|---|
| Media sales pipeline & proposals14% of capability | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Advertiser & agency account management12% of capability | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Integrations12% of capability | 4.5 | 3.2 |
| Order-to-invoice & ad server integration12% of capability | 1.5 | 4.7 |
| Reader & subscriber relationship data10% of capability | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| Sales reporting & forecasting10% of capability | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| Sales team usability8% of capability | 4.6 | 3.0 |
| Workflow automation8% of capability | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Implementation & migration6% of capability | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| Data security & permissions4% of capability | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Mobile & field sales4% of capability | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.3 | 3.8 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Pipedrive | RunMags |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.8 | 3.5 |
| Entry cost | 4.7 | 2.5 |
| Implementation cost | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Ongoing cost | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Pipedrive pricing
Lite from $14/month per seat. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)
RunMags pricing
Pro plan EUR 399/month. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)
What users say
Pipedrive
21 positive · 49 neutral · 13 negative
RunMags
3 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Pipedrive scores 2.5 and RunMags scores 3.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best CRM Solutions for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/pipedrive/runmags, verified Nov 11, 2026)
Common questions
How do Pipedrive and RunMags differ?
Pipedrive is stronger on sales team usability (4.6 vs 3.0). RunMags is stronger on order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.7 vs 1.5), reader & subscriber relationship data (3.8 vs 2.2) and media sales pipeline & proposals (4.6 vs 3.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Pipedrive or RunMags?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Pipedrive scores 4.3/5 and RunMags scores 3.3/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (11 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers. See alternatives to Pipedrive or alternatives to RunMags.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.
