Skip to main content

Head to head · Best Ad Networks for Publishers

PubMatic vs Sovrn

PubMatic and Sovrn score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality.

PubMatic scores 3.8 out of 5 and Sovrn scores 3.8 out of 5, compared across overall score, capability, publisher fit, total cost of ownership, target market and pricing.
CriterionPubMaticStrong ChoiceSovrnStrong Choice
Overall score3.83.8
Capability45% of composite3.6— higher score for PubMatic3.2
Publisher fit40% of composite4.54.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.33.7— higher score for Sovrn
Best forMid-Market, EnterpriseSmall, Mid-Market
PricingRevenue share, taken from auction proceedsPrimarily revenue-share based for ad exchange and commerce tools; custom enterprise pricing for data and SaaS solutions.

PubMatic

  • Owns infrastructure rather than renting cloud capacity
  • Publicly traded with disclosed financials
  • Broad CTV and mobile format support
  • Smaller demand pool than some larger competitors
  • Advanced features may need dedicated account support
Full PubMatic review
Visit PubMatic

Sovrn

  • No minimum traffic requirement
  • Multiple avenues of earning revenue - programmatic ads and affiliate monetization
  • Low $25 minimum payout threshold ideal for smaller publishers
  • Lower eCPM rates for non-US traffic
  • NET 90 payment schedule is longer than most competitors
Full Sovrn review
Visit Sovrn

Common questions

Is PubMatic or Sovrn better?

PubMatic and Sovrn score within 0.2 of each other, so the decision comes down to fit rather than quality. PubMatic scores 3.8/5 and Sovrn scores 3.8/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.

Which is cheaper, PubMatic or Sovrn?

On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — PubMatic scores 2.3/5 and Sovrn scores 3.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.

Still deciding?

Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.

Another SideFlip your perspective