Skip to main content

Recurly vs Zuora

Last verified Nov 12, 2026

At a glance

  • Recurly scores 3.5/5 and Zuora scores 3.9/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent subscription management platforms benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are integrations (Recurly 2.2, Zuora 4.5) and offer & pricing experimentation (Recurly 3.2, Zuora 4.4); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Recurly is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Zuora for enterprise.
  • On total cost of ownership Recurly scores 2.6 and Zuora 1.2 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 5 publishers use Recurly and 10 use Zuora.
  • Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Zuora is stronger on integrations (4.5 vs 2.2), offer & pricing experimentation (4.4 vs 3.2), print & digital bundles (3.0 vs 2.0) and entitlement & access control (4.6 vs 3.6).

Which one fits

Choose Recurly if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight churn prediction & retention automation heavily — Recurly leads on it in this benchmark.

Choose Zuora if…

  • You publish at enterprise scale.
  • You weight integrations, offer & pricing experimentation and print & digital bundles heavily — Zuora leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Recurly and Zuora in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 13 scored tools are in Best Subscription Management Platforms.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionRecurlyZuora
Billing & subscription lifecycle14% of capability4.64.8
Churn prediction & retention automation12% of capability4.64.5
Entitlement & access control12% of capability3.64.6
Integrations10% of capability2.24.5
Offer & pricing experimentation10% of capability3.24.4
Payment methods & tax handling10% of capability4.34.7
Revenue analytics10% of capability4.24.2
Print & digital bundles8% of capability2.03.0
Reader self-service8% of capability3.03.5
Compliance6% of capability4.54.8
Capability45% of composite3.74.3
Publisher fit40% of composite3.54.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.61.2

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreRecurlyZuora
Pricing transparency3.01.0
Entry cost2.51.0
Implementation cost3.00.5
Hidden-fee risk1.52.0
Ongoing cost3.01.5

Recurly pricing

Starter $249/month + 0.9% of billing volume (first $40K/month free of the percentage fee; 90-day free trial); All-Access under 1% of billing volume with a $1M minimum, billed annually; All-Access for Shopify also available. Engage (from $1,600/month) and RevRec (from $850/month) are add-ons.

Zuora pricing

Custom enterprise pricing based on Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) and selected modules; no public flat-rate plans.

What users say

Recurly

8 positive · 5 neutral · 4 negative

Zuora

9 positive · 11 neutral · 7 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Recurly scores 3.5 and Zuora scores 3.9 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Subscription Management Platforms benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/recurly/zuora, verified Nov 12, 2026)

Common questions

How do Recurly and Zuora differ?

Zuora is stronger on integrations (4.5 vs 2.2), offer & pricing experimentation (4.4 vs 3.2), print & digital bundles (3.0 vs 2.0) and entitlement & access control (4.6 vs 3.6). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Recurly or Zuora?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Recurly scores 2.6/5 and Zuora scores 1.2/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Subscription Management Platforms. See alternatives to Recurly or alternatives to Zuora.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Subscription Management Platforms.

Explore AlternativesWhat other subscription management platforms should I consid...