Skip to main content

At a glance

  • RunMags scores 3.8/5 and Workbooks scores 3.4/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent CRM solutions benchmark, both assessed on the same 11 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are sales reporting & forecasting (RunMags 2.8, Workbooks 4.1) and workflow automation (RunMags 4.5, Workbooks 3.6); they are within 0.3 on 7 of 11 criteria.
  • RunMags is built for small and mid-market publishers; Workbooks for mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership RunMags scores 3.3 and Workbooks 4.0 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 1 publishers use RunMags and 3 use Workbooks.
  • Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

RunMags is stronger on workflow automation (4.5 vs 3.6), order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.7 vs 3.9) and media sales pipeline & proposals (4.6 vs 4.2).

Workbooks is stronger on sales reporting & forecasting (4.1 vs 2.8).

Which one fits

Choose RunMags if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight workflow automation, order-to-invoice & ad server integration and media sales pipeline & proposals heavily — RunMags leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Workbooks if…

  • You publish at mid-market scale.
  • You weight sales reporting & forecasting and advertiser & agency account management heavily — Workbooks leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to RunMags and Workbooks in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 8 scored tools are in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionRunMagsWorkbooks
Media sales pipeline & proposals14% of capability4.64.2
Advertiser & agency account management12% of capability3.53.8
Integrations12% of capability3.23.0
Order-to-invoice & ad server integration12% of capability4.73.9
Reader & subscriber relationship data10% of capability3.83.5
Sales reporting & forecasting10% of capability2.84.1
Sales team usability8% of capability3.02.8
Workflow automation8% of capability4.53.6
Implementation & migration6% of capability4.04.0
Data security & permissions4% of capability3.53.5
Mobile & field sales4% of capability3.53.2
Capability45% of composite3.83.6
Publisher fit40% of composite4.03.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.34.0

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreRunMagsWorkbooks
Pricing transparency3.54.5
Entry cost2.54.6
Implementation cost2.02.5
Hidden-fee risk4.54.2
Ongoing cost4.04.3

RunMags pricing

Pro plan EUR 399/month. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)

Workbooks pricing

From GBP 32 / EUR 26 / $47 per user (vendor pricing calculator). (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)

What users say

RunMags

3 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative

Workbooks

2 positive · 6 neutral · 1 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

RunMags scores 3.8 and Workbooks scores 3.4 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best CRM Solutions for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/runmags/workbooks, verified Nov 12, 2026)

Common questions

How do RunMags and Workbooks differ?

RunMags is stronger on workflow automation (4.5 vs 3.6), order-to-invoice & ad server integration (4.7 vs 3.9) and media sales pipeline & proposals (4.6 vs 4.2). Workbooks is stronger on sales reporting & forecasting (4.1 vs 2.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, RunMags or Workbooks?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — RunMags scores 3.3/5 and Workbooks scores 4.0/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (11 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers. See alternatives to RunMags or alternatives to Workbooks.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best CRM Solutions for Publishers.

Another SideWhich CRM is better for small publishers?