Stay22 vs Yieldkit
Stay22
AI-powered monetization platform helping publishers and creators turn travel intent into booking revenue.
Publishers using it: 12 · incl. Liverpool Echo, Lonely Planet, Daily Mirror
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Stay22 scores 3.8/5 and Yieldkit scores 3.5/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent affiliate networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are reporting & api (Stay22 2.4, Yieldkit 4.0) and publisher approval & programme access (Stay22 3.0, Yieldkit 4.3); they are within 0.3 on 2 of 10 criteria.
- Stay22 is built for small and mid-market publishers; Yieldkit for small, mid-market and enterprise.
- On total cost of ownership Stay22 scores 4.6 and Yieldkit 3.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 12 publishers use Stay22 and 2 use Yieldkit.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Stay22 is stronger on product feeds & price comparison (3.5 vs 2.3) and commission rates & payout terms (3.4 vs 2.5).
Yieldkit is stronger on reporting & API (4.0 vs 2.4) and publisher approval & programme access (4.3 vs 3.0).
Which one fits
Choose Stay22 if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight product feeds & price comparison, commission rates & payout terms and integration heavily — Stay22 leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Yieldkit if…
- You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight reporting & API, publisher approval & programme access and disclosure & compliance tools heavily — Yieldkit leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Stay22 and Yieldkit in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 3.8AwinA global affiliate marketing platform connecting publishers with diverse advertisers to drive performanceRead review
- 3.7CJ.comA global affiliate marketing network connecting publishers with premium brand advertisersRead review
- 3.9ImpactComprehensive partnership management platform for automating affiliate, influencer, and creator growthRead review
- 3.8RakutenA global performance marketing network connecting brands with premium publishers via affiliate and media solutions, in a strategic alliance with impact.com (April 2026).Read review
All 12 scored tools are in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Head to head
| Criterion | Stay22 | Yieldkit |
|---|---|---|
| Commission rates & payout terms14% of capability | 3.4 | 2.5 |
| Merchant & programme coverage14% of capability | 3.8 | 4.2 |
| Tracking accuracy & attribution14% of capability | 3.2 | 3.8 |
| Link automation & commerce content tools12% of capability | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Payment reliability & thresholds10% of capability | 3.9 | 3.8 |
| Reporting & API10% of capability | 2.4 | 4.0 |
| Product feeds & price comparison8% of capability | 3.5 | 2.3 |
| Disclosure & compliance tools6% of capability | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| Integration6% of capability | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Publisher approval & programme access6% of capability | 3.0 | 4.3 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.4 | 3.6 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Stay22 | Yieldkit |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Entry cost | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Implementation cost | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Ongoing cost | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Stay22 pricing
Free to use for publishers; operates on a performance-based revenue-share model where creators earn a commission on completed bookings.
Yieldkit pricing
Performance-based revenue share model (Free to join for publishers; the platform typically retains a percentage of the generated affiliate commission).
What users say
Stay22
20 positive · 8 neutral · 5 negative
Yieldkit
4 positive · 5 neutral · 2 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Stay22 scores 3.8 and Yieldkit scores 3.5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/stay22/yieldkit, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Stay22 and Yieldkit differ?
Stay22 is stronger on product feeds & price comparison (3.5 vs 2.3) and commission rates & payout terms (3.4 vs 2.5). Yieldkit is stronger on reporting & API (4.0 vs 2.4) and publisher approval & programme access (4.3 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Stay22 or Yieldkit?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Stay22 scores 4.6/5 and Yieldkit scores 3.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Stay22 or alternatives to Yieldkit.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Four questions, and a scored stack across every benchmark — not just Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers
Every scored tool in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers, with the criteria behind each number
Every category, independently scored
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Affiliate Networks for Publishers.
