Securiti
Unified consent, privacy, and data governance
Best for enterprise publishers.
Summary review · Last verified Oct 19, 2026 · Scored on 10 criteria · Vendors can't pay for scores
Research by Vahe Arabian · Scored and edited by the SODP team
Key facts
- Score
- 2.6 / 5
- Tier
- Limited
- Pricing model
- Custom pricing; contact the vendor for…
- Type
- Consent management platform
- Publishers using it
- 1
- Founded
- 2019
- HQ
- San Jose, United States
- Headcount
- 1,208
At a glance
- Securiti scores 2.6/5 (Limited) in Benchmark Grid's independent consent management platforms (cmps) benchmark, assessed on 10 published criteria.
- It is built for enterprise publishers.
- Strongest on Global Privacy Regulation Coverage (GDPR/CCPA/LGPD) (4.2) and First-Party Data & Preference Center Enablement (3.8); weakest on Ad Recovery & Vendor Gating (2.2).
- Pricing: Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote.
- 1 publishers in our tracking use Securiti, from ads.txt files, page code and public case studies.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Summary
Editor's update, October 2026: 19 Oct 2026 accuracy audit: Veeam ownership added, empty copy written.
Enterprise data security and privacy platform, now owned by Veeam, combining consent management and mobile app consent with data governance for organisations with complex compliance obligations.
Securiti, now owned by Veeam, sells the DataAI Command Platform, which covers data security posture management, AI security and governance, data governance and privacy operations. Consent Management, covering first- and third-party consent from scanning to reporting, and Mobile App Consent Management are modules within that wider platform.
Its standout is breadth of privacy operations. Consent sits alongside DSR automation, compliance and breach management, so organisations with complex, multi-jurisdiction obligations can run consent within one governance programme.
The limitations for publishers are focus and cost. Securiti targets finance, healthcare, telecom, retail, travel and manufacturing rather than media, its homepage makes no claims about publisher ad-stack features, and pricing is available only through a demo.
Score breakdown
2.6 = 0.45 × 3.20 capability + 0.40 × 2.00 publisher fit + 0.15 × 2.10 cost
Σ (criterion rating × weight) across 10 criteria · scale 1 (poor) → 5 (excellent)
As an enterprise-grade CMP, it supports standard IAB frameworks necessary for ad-tech compliance.
14% of capability · What we check: The platform broadcasts valid TCF v2.2 strings to vendors and handles granular user consent signals accurately.
The platform focuses on compliance rigor rather than specialized CRO features for opt-in conversion.
12% of capability · What we check: The consent notice layout is clear, accessible, and provides A/B testing or customization options to improve interaction.
Maintains necessary integrations for Google ecosystem compliance which is standard for privacy platforms.
12% of capability · What we check: The platform correctly updates ad tags based on user consent signals to satisfy Google's specific technical requirements.
The platform is built with a heavy emphasis on complex, multi-jurisdictional regulatory compliance.
12% of capability · What we check: The software offers geo-targeted consent logic and disclosure settings to meet specific regional legal requirements.
Strong focus on data governance provides a solid foundation for managing first-party preference centers.
12% of capability · What we check: The existence of a user dashboard allowing visitors to manage or update their data collection preferences at any time.
Offers standard integration capabilities suitable for general enterprise implementation environments.
10% of capability · What we check: The platform provides native plugins or snippets for easy deployment via Google Tag Manager or common CMS platforms.
Provides basic synchronization features, though deep native app optimization is less prominent.
8% of capability · What we check: Consent choices made on one device or app platform are persisted and recognized across other user sessions.
The focus is primarily on privacy and data governance rather than specialized ad-recovery revenue tools.
8% of capability · What we check: The mechanism that blocks unauthorized third-party trackers until the user provides affirmative consent.
Performance is adequate for general enterprise needs but not specifically optimized for high-frequency ad-load environments.
6% of capability · What we check: Measures the milliseconds added to page load time caused by the consent script execution during initial page rendering.
Enterprise-focused service models typically provide robust support and documentation for complex deployments.
6% of capability · What we check: Available technical manuals, API documentation, and response times for troubleshooting implementation issues.
Securiti scores 2.6/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/best-consent-management-platforms-for-publishers/securiti, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- Consent managed within a wider governance programme
- Covers web and mobile app consent
- Strong multi-jurisdiction privacy operations
Limitations
- Not aimed at media or publishers
- No publisher ad-stack features evidenced
- No published pricing
Who uses it
Detected from site code, ads.txt records and published case studies — not from the vendor's own customer list. 0 confirmed, 1 seen in a single source.
By publisher size
By content vertical
Publishers running Securiti1
- Sky NewsEnterprise· News· reported
Cost of ownership
Pricing
Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote.
Pricing unclear for your setup? — we'll make the introduction. Free, and it never affects the score.
Cost data sourced from vendor pricing pages and community signals. Vendors may dispute any factor.
What users say
Users report that implementation takes three months, noting concerns regarding the platform's user experience and value for money compared to other available privacy and compliance solutions.
Sources: G2 80% · Capterra 20%
Most discussed
5 mentions from 2 independent sources, each read and scored by our analyser. Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions shown above.
The company behind Securiti
Company facts come from an independent business-data record rather than the vendor's own site.
- Founded
- 2019
- Employees
- 1,208
- Headquarters
- San Jose, United States
- Ownership
- Privately Held
Compare Securiti
The head-to-heads publishers look at most, then the closest contests in the same benchmark.
FAQ
How is Securiti scored?
Securiti scores 2.6 out of 5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Consent Management Platforms (CMPs) for Publishers benchmark. The overall figure blends capability (45%), publisher fit (40%) and cost of ownership (15%). Capability is itself a weighted average of 10 criteria; the heaviest are iab tcf v2.2 compliance & ad-tech signal propagation (14%), consent capture ux & opt-in rate optimization (12%) and google consent mode v2 integration (12%). Vendors cannot pay for a score.
What size publisher is Securiti built for?
Securiti is built for enterprise publishers. That is the vendor's own stated target, and it is one of the inputs to our publisher-fit score — a platform that suits a national newsroom often carries more operational load than a small one can absorb.
What does Securiti cost?
Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote. Our cost-of-ownership score is 2.1/5, which weighs pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation cost, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost. Ask the vendor for a written first-year figure that includes implementation before you commit.
Who uses Securiti?
We have evidenced 1 publisher running Securiti. Adoptions are detected from site code, ads.txt records and published case studies rather than taken from the vendor's own customer list, and each one is listed on this page.
Can Securiti pay for a better score?
No. Scores come from our editorial review of the product's documentation, demos and public evidence. A vendor can claim this listing or request a re-review, but nothing they buy changes a score or a position.
Verify a claim
Enter a claim about Securiti and our AI will check it against the benchmark data on this page. Claims we have already fact-checked are listed below.
3 verifications remaining
Where to next
Is this your tool? Claim the listing, get your score badge or request a hands-on review. Neither changes the score.
