Skip to main content

Asana vs Monday.com

Last verified Sep 20, 2026

At a glance

  • Asana scores 4.0/5 and Monday.com scores 3.0/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent editorial calendar software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are editorial workflow & approvals (Asana 4.5, Monday.com 2.2) and performance tracking (Asana 1.2, Monday.com 2.8); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Both are built for small, mid-market and enterprise publishers.
  • On total cost of ownership Asana scores 3.5 and Monday.com 4.1 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 7 publishers use Asana and 2 use Monday.com.
  • Scores last verified 20 Sep 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Asana is stronger on editorial workflow & approvals (4.5 vs 2.2), CMS & publishing integrations (3.2 vs 2.4) and implementation & support (3.8 vs 3.0).

Monday.com is stronger on performance tracking (2.8 vs 1.2).

Which one fits

Choose Asana if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight editorial workflow & approvals, CMS & publishing integrations and implementation & support heavily — Asana leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Monday.com if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight performance tracking heavily — Monday.com leads on it in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Asana and Monday.com in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAsanaMonday.com
Editorial workflow & approvals14% of capability4.52.2
Planning & scheduling views14% of capability4.64.6
CMS & publishing integrations12% of capability3.22.4
Collaboration12% of capability4.74.2
Custom fields & templates10% of capability4.64.3
Multi-channel planning10% of capability4.43.8
Performance tracking8% of capability1.22.8
Usability8% of capability4.54.2
Implementation & support6% of capability3.83.0
Permissions & security6% of capability4.54.4
Capability45% of composite4.13.6
Publisher fit40% of composite4.02.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.54.1

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAsanaMonday.com
Pricing transparency3.84.6
Entry cost4.04.5
Implementation cost3.54.4
Hidden-fee risk3.33.1
Ongoing cost2.93.8

Asana pricing

Free Personal tier (up to 2 users); Starter from $10.99/user/month; Advanced from $24.99/user/month (annual billing). Enterprise and AI add-ons require custom quotes.

Monday.com pricing

Free for up to 2 seats; paid plans start at $9/seat/month (Basic) with a 3-seat minimum; AI features use a credit-based billing system starting at $0.01/credit.

What users say

Asana

21 positive · 10 neutral · 13 negative

Monday.com

6 positive · 34 neutral · 5 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Asana scores 4.0 and Monday.com scores 3.0 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Editorial Calendar Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/asana/monday-com, verified Sep 20, 2026)

Common questions

How do Asana and Monday.com differ?

Asana is stronger on editorial workflow & approvals (4.5 vs 2.2), CMS & publishing integrations (3.2 vs 2.4) and implementation & support (3.8 vs 3.0). Monday.com is stronger on performance tracking (2.8 vs 1.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Asana or Monday.com?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Asana scores 3.5/5 and Monday.com scores 4.1/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to Asana or alternatives to Monday.com.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Compare ToolsWhat are the main differences between Asana and CoSchedule?