Skip to main content

AWeber vs Mailchimp

Last verified Nov 11, 2026

At a glance

  • AWeber scores 2.8/5 and Mailchimp scores 2.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent email newsletter platforms benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are analytics after apple mail privacy protection (AWeber 1.6, Mailchimp 3.2) and sending performance at scale (AWeber 3.5, Mailchimp 4.5); they are within 0.3 on 5 of 10 criteria.
  • AWeber is built for small publishers; Mailchimp for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership AWeber scores 3.2 and Mailchimp 2.8 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 3 publishers use AWeber and 20 use Mailchimp.
  • Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Mailchimp is stronger on analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection (3.2 vs 1.6), sending performance at scale (4.5 vs 3.5), segmentation & automation (4.6 vs 3.8) and editor & template design (4.0 vs 3.5).

Which one fits

Choose AWeber if…

  • You publish at small scale.
  • You weight monetisation and deliverability & inbox placement heavily — AWeber leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Mailchimp if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection, sending performance at scale and segmentation & automation heavily — Mailchimp leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to AWeber and Mailchimp in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 7 scored tools are in Best Email Newsletter Platforms.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionAWeberMailchimp
Deliverability & inbox placement16% of capability4.64.5
Audience growth tools12% of capability3.23.5
Monetisation12% of capability2.82.5
Segmentation & automation12% of capability3.84.6
Analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection10% of capability1.63.2
Editor & template design10% of capability3.54.0
Integrations & API8% of capability4.24.7
Subscriber management & data portability8% of capability3.53.5
Compliance & list hygiene6% of capability3.53.8
Sending performance at scale6% of capability3.54.5
Capability45% of composite3.53.9
Publisher fit40% of composite2.01.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.22.8

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreAWeberMailchimp
Pricing transparency3.83.8
Entry cost3.93.7
Implementation cost3.83.8
Hidden-fee risk2.01.2
Ongoing cost2.41.6

AWeber pricing

Per-subscriber SaaS tiers

Mailchimp pricing

Free tier available (250 contacts, 500 monthly sends); paid plans start at $13/mo for Essentials, $20/mo for Standard, and $350/mo for Premium.

What users say

AWeber

7 positive · 15 neutral · 10 negative

Mailchimp

18 positive · 38 neutral · 51 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

AWeber scores 2.8 and Mailchimp scores 2.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Email Newsletter Platforms benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/aweber/mailchimp, verified Nov 11, 2026)

Common questions

How do AWeber and Mailchimp differ?

Mailchimp is stronger on analytics after Apple Mail Privacy Protection (3.2 vs 1.6), sending performance at scale (4.5 vs 3.5), segmentation & automation (4.6 vs 3.8) and editor & template design (4.0 vs 3.5). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, AWeber or Mailchimp?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — AWeber scores 3.2/5 and Mailchimp scores 2.8/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Email Newsletter Platforms. See alternatives to AWeber or alternatives to Mailchimp.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Email Newsletter Platforms.

Explore AlternativesWhat other email platforms should I consider besides AWeber...