Skip to main content

Blockthrough vs Sulvo

Sulvo

Sulvo

Find what’s holding your revenue back.

3.6Fair Fit

Publishers using it: 2

Visit website

Last verified Nov 11, 2026

At a glance

  • Blockthrough scores 4.1/5 and Sulvo scores 3.6/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent adblock recovery software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are acceptable ads & consent-compliant delivery (Blockthrough 4.8, Sulvo 2.5) and alternative monetisation for blockers (Blockthrough 1.5, Sulvo 0.5); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Blockthrough is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Sulvo for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Blockthrough scores 3.2 and Sulvo 2.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 46 publishers use Blockthrough and 2 use Sulvo.
  • Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Blockthrough is stronger on acceptable Ads & consent-compliant delivery (4.8 vs 2.5), alternative monetisation for blockers (1.5 vs 0.5), integration effort (4.5 vs 3.5) and recovery reporting (4.0 vs 3.0).

Which one fits

Choose Blockthrough if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight acceptable Ads & consent-compliant delivery, alternative monetisation for blockers and recovery reporting heavily — Blockthrough leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Sulvo if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight recovery rate & revenue recovered and detection accuracy & circumvention resilience heavily — Sulvo leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Blockthrough and Sulvo in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 7 scored tools are in Best Adblock Recovery Software.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionBlockthroughSulvo
Recovery rate & revenue recovered16% of capability3.53.8
Acceptable Ads & consent-compliant delivery12% of capability4.82.5
Detection accuracy & circumvention resilience12% of capability3.23.5
Reader experience12% of capability4.03.2
Ad stack compatibility10% of capability4.54.2
Alternative monetisation for blockers10% of capability1.50.5
Recovery reporting10% of capability4.03.0
Page speed impact8% of capability3.83.0
Integration effort6% of capability4.53.5
Legal compliance4% of capability3.53.5
Capability45% of composite3.73.1
Publisher fit40% of composite4.94.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.22.6

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreBlockthroughSulvo
Pricing transparency0.91.0
Entry cost3.92.5
Implementation cost3.93.5
Hidden-fee risk3.93.0
Ongoing cost3.53.0

Blockthrough pricing

Revenue-share model based on incremental earnings; no setup fees, upfront costs, or long-term commitments required.

Sulvo pricing

Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote. Free 100-point diagnostic and 30-day Unblocker trial; Enterprise managed service from 250M+ monthly impressions.

What users say

Blockthrough

5 positive · 5 neutral · 4 negative

Sulvo

5 positive · 10 neutral · 3 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Blockthrough scores 4.1 and Sulvo scores 3.6 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Adblock Recovery Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/blockthrough/sulvo, verified Nov 11, 2026)

Common questions

How do Blockthrough and Sulvo differ?

Blockthrough is stronger on acceptable Ads & consent-compliant delivery (4.8 vs 2.5), alternative monetisation for blockers (1.5 vs 0.5), integration effort (4.5 vs 3.5) and recovery reporting (4.0 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Blockthrough or Sulvo?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Blockthrough scores 3.2/5 and Sulvo scores 2.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Adblock Recovery Software. See alternatives to Blockthrough or alternatives to Sulvo.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Adblock Recovery Software.

Compare AdblockersWhat are the key differences between Blockthrough and AdPush...