Skip to main content

BLOX Digital (TownNews) vs WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora)

Last verified Oct 19, 2026

At a glance

  • BLOX Digital (TownNews) scores 3.9/5 and WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) scores 3.9/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent CMS platforms benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are monetisation integration (BLOX Digital (TownNews) 4.7, WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) 1.6) and integrations & extensibility (BLOX Digital (TownNews) 3.2, WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) 4.5); they are within 0.3 on 1 of 10 criteria.
  • BLOX Digital (TownNews) is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) for enterprise.
  • On total cost of ownership BLOX Digital (TownNews) scores 1.5 and WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) 1.4 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 9 publishers use BLOX Digital (TownNews) and 5 use WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora).
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

BLOX Digital (TownNews) is stronger on monetisation integration (4.7 vs 1.6), AI & automation (4.5 vs 3.5) and SEO & structured data (4.0 vs 3.0).

WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) is stronger on integrations & extensibility (4.5 vs 3.2).

Which one fits

Choose BLOX Digital (TownNews) if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight monetisation integration, SEO & structured data and AI & automation heavily — BLOX Digital (TownNews) leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) if…

  • You publish at enterprise scale.
  • You weight integrations & extensibility, multi-channel & headless delivery and editorial workflow & newsroom collaboration heavily — WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to BLOX Digital (TownNews) and WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 33 scored tools are in Best CMS Platforms for News Sites.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionBLOX Digital (TownNews)WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora)
Editorial workflow & newsroom collaboration14% of capability4.24.8
Performance & scale under traffic spikes12% of capability4.64.2
SEO & structured data12% of capability4.03.0
Content modelling & formats10% of capability4.34.6
Integrations & extensibility10% of capability3.24.5
Monetisation integration10% of capability4.71.6
Multi-channel & headless delivery10% of capability3.84.5
AI & automation8% of capability4.53.5
Security, uptime & compliance8% of capability4.44.0
Migration & implementation6% of capability3.52.8
Capability45% of composite4.13.8
Publisher fit40% of composite4.54.9
Total cost of ownership15% of composite1.51.4

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreBLOX Digital (TownNews)WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora)
Pricing transparency0.81.0
Entry cost0.81.0
Implementation cost1.20.5
Hidden-fee risk2.43.0
Ongoing cost2.41.5

BLOX Digital (TownNews) pricing

Custom enterprise pricing; costs are typically based on scale, pageviews, and selected software modules.

WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) pricing

Custom enterprise pricing available in Starter, Advanced, and Ultimate tiers; quotes provided upon request.

What users say

BLOX Digital (TownNews)

3 positive · 6 neutral · 2 negative

WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora)

1 positive · 2 neutral · 1 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

BLOX Digital (TownNews) scores 3.9 and WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) scores 3.9 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best CMS Platforms for News Sites benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/blox-digital-townnews/woodwing-studio-formerly-aurora, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do BLOX Digital (TownNews) and WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) differ?

BLOX Digital (TownNews) is stronger on monetisation integration (4.7 vs 1.6), AI & automation (4.5 vs 3.5) and SEO & structured data (4.0 vs 3.0). WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) is stronger on integrations & extensibility (4.5 vs 3.2). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, BLOX Digital (TownNews) or WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora)?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — BLOX Digital (TownNews) scores 1.5/5 and WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora) scores 1.4/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best CMS Platforms for News Sites. See alternatives to BLOX Digital (TownNews) or alternatives to WoodWing Studio (formerly Aurora).

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best CMS Platforms for News Sites.

Another SideWhat are the key differences in publisher fit between BLOX D...