Head to head · Best Editorial Calendar Software
CoSchedule vs MultiCollab
MultiCollab scores higher overall (3.5 vs 2.8), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you.
| Criterion | CoScheduleMarginal Fit | MultiCollabFair Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.8 | 3.5— higher score for MultiCollab |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.9— higher score for CoSchedule | 2.6 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 1.0 | 4.5— higher score for MultiCollab |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 4.3— higher score for CoSchedule | 3.5 |
| Best for | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Small, Mid-Market |
| Pricing | Free Forever plan available; Social Calendar starts at $19/user/mo (billed annually); Marketing Suite and Enterprise plans require custom quotes. | Free version available; paid Lite plan starts at $249/year, with Pro plans at $599/year. |
CoSchedule
- Unified marketing calendar
- Easy tracking
- Collaborate and organize all marketing in one place
- Could do better with deeper integration options for third-party analytics tools
MultiCollab
- Real-time co-editing within WordPress block editor
- Inline comments and suggestions similar to Google Docs
- No external tool required for editorial collaboration
- WordPress-only
- Not a full editorial calendar — collaboration only, no scheduling
- Requires WordPress Block Editor (Gutenberg)
Common questions
Is CoSchedule or MultiCollab better?
MultiCollab scores higher overall (3.5 vs 2.8), but the right pick depends on which dimension matters most to you. CoSchedule scores 2.8/5 and MultiCollab scores 3.5/5 on Benchmark Grid's independent assessment. Scores are set editorially by SODP against published criteria and cannot be purchased.
Which is cheaper, CoSchedule or MultiCollab?
On total cost of ownership — which covers pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — CoSchedule scores 4.3/5 and MultiCollab scores 3.5/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed across 12 criteria grouped into Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher Fit (40%) and Total Cost of Ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or rankings.
Still deciding?
Answer four questions about your publication and we'll recommend a full stack — with the reasoning for each pick and what it will cost.
Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to CoSchedule or alternatives to MultiCollab.
