FoxPush vs Gravitec
FoxPush
A programmatic push notification platform built for publisher monetization and audience retention
Publishers using it: 1
Gravitec
Automated web push notification platform for publishers to increase traffic and reader retention
Publishers using it: 4 · incl. Kyiv Post, Brickset.com, Digital Doorway
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- FoxPush scores 3.6/5 and Gravitec scores 2.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent push notification services benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are monetisation (FoxPush 4.8, Gravitec 1.5) and platform coverage (FoxPush 3.5, Gravitec 2.0); they are within 0.3 on 3 of 10 criteria.
- Both are built for small and mid-market publishers.
- On total cost of ownership FoxPush scores 3.8 and Gravitec 4.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 1 publishers use FoxPush and 4 use Gravitec.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
FoxPush is stronger on monetisation (4.8 vs 1.5), platform coverage (3.5 vs 2.0) and analytics & attribution (3.5 vs 2.5).
Gravitec is stronger on integration effort & page speed (4.0 vs 3.0).
Which one fits
Choose FoxPush if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight monetisation, platform coverage and analytics & attribution heavily — FoxPush leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Gravitec if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight integration effort & page speed, automation & triggers and opt-in rate optimisation heavily — Gravitec leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to FoxPush and Gravitec in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 3.3AirshipEnterprise-grade mobile engagement platform for orchestrating automated multi-channel customer journeys at scaleRead review
- 3.5PushEngageThe leading web push notification platform to increase traffic, engagement, and sales with automated messaging.Read review
- 2.9WebPushrHigh-performance web push notification platform with advanced segmentation and a generous 10k subscriber free tier.Read review
- 3.0WonderPush (a Brevo company)Unlimited push notifications for iOS, Android and WebRead review
All 12 scored tools are in Best Push Notification Services.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
FoxPush · 1
Head to head
| Criterion | FoxPush | Gravitec |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery speed & reliability at scale14% of capability | 2.5 | 2.8 |
| Automation & triggers12% of capability | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| Opt-in rate optimisation12% of capability | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| Targeting & segmentation12% of capability | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Analytics & attribution10% of capability | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Integration effort & page speed8% of capability | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Monetisation8% of capability | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Platform coverage8% of capability | 3.5 | 2.0 |
| Privacy & compliance8% of capability | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| Rich content & formats8% of capability | 2.5 | 2.8 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.8 | 4.6 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | FoxPush | Gravitec |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.0 | 4.8 |
| Entry cost | 4.3 | 4.9 |
| Implementation cost | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Ongoing cost | 3.1 | 4.6 |
FoxPush pricing
Basic free (unlimited subscribers, 1 site); Premium $49/month (5 sites); Business $199/month (7 sites); Enterprise $300/month (unlimited sites, contact sales).
Gravitec pricing
Free up to 10,000 subscribers; Fix plan $20/month. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)
What users say
FoxPush
1 positive · 4 neutral · 2 negative
Gravitec
14 positive · 4 neutral · 0 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
FoxPush scores 3.6 and Gravitec scores 2.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Push Notification Services benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/foxpush/gravitec, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do FoxPush and Gravitec differ?
FoxPush is stronger on monetisation (4.8 vs 1.5), platform coverage (3.5 vs 2.0) and analytics & attribution (3.5 vs 2.5). Gravitec is stronger on integration effort & page speed (4.0 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, FoxPush or Gravitec?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — FoxPush scores 3.8/5 and Gravitec scores 4.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Push Notification Services. See alternatives to FoxPush or alternatives to Gravitec.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Push Notification Services.
