HUMAN Security vs ScalePost
HUMAN Security
Bot detection and analytics validated against trillions of interactions
Publishers using it: 14 · incl. Pandora Media, Texas Monthly, 9to5Mac
ScalePost
AI visibility measurement showing which AI answers cite your content
Publishers using it: —
Last verified Nov 12, 2026
At a glance
- HUMAN Security scores 2.7/5 and ScalePost scores 3.2/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent bot & AI crawler analytics benchmark, both assessed on the same 11 criteria.
- The widest gaps are access control & policy enforcement (HUMAN Security 4.5, ScalePost 1.2) and search bot governance (HUMAN Security 3.8, ScalePost 2.0); they are within 0.3 on 1 of 11 criteria.
- HUMAN Security is built for enterprise publishers; ScalePost for small and mid-market.
- On total cost of ownership HUMAN Security scores 1.4 and ScalePost 1.9 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 14 publishers use HUMAN Security and 0 use ScalePost.
- Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
HUMAN Security is stronger on access Control & Policy Enforcement (4.5 vs 1.2), search Bot Governance (3.8 vs 2.0) and technical Performance & Scale (4.9 vs 3.6).
ScalePost is stronger on deployment & Time to Value (3.0 vs 1.5).
Which one fits
Choose HUMAN Security if…
- You publish at enterprise scale.
- You weight access Control & Policy Enforcement, search Bot Governance and technical Performance & Scale heavily — HUMAN Security leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose ScalePost if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight deployment & Time to Value and publisher-Specific Reporting heavily — ScalePost leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to HUMAN Security and ScalePost in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 3.6BlankspaceAI traffic analytics and monetization for publishers at the CDN edgeRead review
- 3.5Cloudflare AI Crawl ControlEdge-level AI crawler analytics and control across your whole domainRead review
- 3.1Fastly Bot ManagementEdge bot detection with AI crawler controls and ScalePost analyticsRead review
- 3.5HoneyLogServer-side log analytics that exposes the AI bots client-side tracking cannot seeRead review
All 10 scored tools are in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
HUMAN Security · 14
- Pandora Media
- Texas Monthly
- 9to5Mac
- Marketecture
- Skipblast
- The Post Millennial
- ADSN
- Discover Digest
- NoCommute
- Popular Fintech
- Sounds Profitable
- StrictlyVC
ScalePost · 0
No publisher adoption verified yet.
Head to head
| Criterion | HUMAN Security | ScalePost |
|---|---|---|
| Crawler Identification & Classification11% of capability | 4.8 | 3.8 |
| Traffic Visibility & Coverage11% of capability | 4.6 | 3.8 |
| Access Control & Policy Enforcement10% of capability | 4.5 | 1.2 |
| AI Traffic Monetization & Licensing10% of capability | 2.8 | 2.2 |
| AI Traffic Reporting & Analytics10% of capability | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Data Integration & Export9% of capability | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Publisher-Specific Reporting9% of capability | 2.2 | 3.2 |
| Technical Performance & Scale9% of capability | 4.9 | 3.6 |
| Search Bot Governance8% of capability | 3.8 | 2.0 |
| Privacy & Compliance7% of capability | 3.8 | 2.5 |
| Deployment & Time to Value6% of capability | 1.5 | 3.0 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 1.4 | 1.9 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | HUMAN Security | ScalePost |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Entry cost | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Implementation cost | 0.5 | 2.5 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| Ongoing cost | 2.0 | 3.0 |
HUMAN Security pricing
Enterprise pricing on request.
ScalePost pricing
Subscription pricing on request.
What users say
HUMAN Security
3 positive · 4 neutral · 0 negative
ScalePost
2 positive · 7 neutral · 0 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
HUMAN Security scores 2.7 and ScalePost scores 3.2 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/human-security/scalepost, verified Nov 12, 2026)
Common questions
How do HUMAN Security and ScalePost differ?
HUMAN Security is stronger on access Control & Policy Enforcement (4.5 vs 1.2), search Bot Governance (3.8 vs 2.0) and technical Performance & Scale (4.9 vs 3.6). ScalePost is stronger on deployment & Time to Value (3.0 vs 1.5). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, HUMAN Security or ScalePost?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — HUMAN Security scores 1.4/5 and ScalePost scores 1.9/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (11 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers. See alternatives to HUMAN Security or alternatives to ScalePost.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Four questions, and a scored stack across every benchmark — not just Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers
Every scored tool in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers, with the criteria behind each number
Every category, independently scored
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers.
