HUMAN Security vs Screpy
HUMAN Security
Bot detection and analytics validated against trillions of interactions
Publishers using it: 14 · incl. Pandora Media, Texas Monthly, 9to5Mac
Last verified Nov 12, 2026
At a glance
- HUMAN Security scores 2.7/5 and Screpy scores 2.0/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent bot & AI crawler analytics benchmark, both assessed on the same 11 criteria.
- The widest gaps are access control & policy enforcement (HUMAN Security 4.5, Screpy 0.5) and deployment & time to value (HUMAN Security 1.5, Screpy 4.2).
- HUMAN Security is built for enterprise publishers; Screpy for small.
- On total cost of ownership HUMAN Security scores 1.4 and Screpy 4.1 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 14 publishers use HUMAN Security and 0 use Screpy.
- Scores last verified 12 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
HUMAN Security is stronger on access Control & Policy Enforcement (4.5 vs 0.5), AI Traffic Monetization & Licensing (2.8 vs 0.2) and technical Performance & Scale (4.9 vs 2.8).
Screpy is stronger on deployment & Time to Value (4.2 vs 1.5).
Which one fits
Choose HUMAN Security if…
- You publish at enterprise scale.
- You weight access Control & Policy Enforcement, AI Traffic Monetization & Licensing and technical Performance & Scale heavily — HUMAN Security leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Screpy if…
- You publish at small scale.
- You weight deployment & Time to Value heavily — Screpy leads on it in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to HUMAN Security and Screpy in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 2.3Akamai Bot ManagerEnterprise bot analytics and mitigation at the network edgeRead review
- 2.3DataDomeBot management with real-time traffic analytics and mitigationRead review
- 3.1Fastly Bot ManagementEdge bot detection with AI crawler controls and ScalePost analyticsRead review
- 2.2ImpervaBot management and traffic analytics for high-traffic publisher sitesRead review
All 10 scored tools are in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
HUMAN Security · 14
- Pandora Media
- Texas Monthly
- 9to5Mac
- Marketecture
- Skipblast
- The Post Millennial
- ADSN
- Discover Digest
- NoCommute
- Popular Fintech
- Sounds Profitable
- StrictlyVC
Screpy · 0
No publisher adoption verified yet.
Head to head
| Criterion | HUMAN Security | Screpy |
|---|---|---|
| Crawler Identification & Classification11% of capability | 4.8 | 3.2 |
| Traffic Visibility & Coverage11% of capability | 4.6 | 3.0 |
| Access Control & Policy Enforcement10% of capability | 4.5 | 0.5 |
| AI Traffic Monetization & Licensing10% of capability | 2.8 | 0.2 |
| AI Traffic Reporting & Analytics10% of capability | 4.2 | 2.8 |
| Data Integration & Export9% of capability | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Publisher-Specific Reporting9% of capability | 2.2 | 1.5 |
| Technical Performance & Scale9% of capability | 4.9 | 2.8 |
| Search Bot Governance8% of capability | 3.8 | 2.0 |
| Privacy & Compliance7% of capability | 3.8 | 2.4 |
| Deployment & Time to Value6% of capability | 1.5 | 4.2 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.8 | 2.2 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 1.4 | 4.1 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | HUMAN Security | Screpy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 1.0 | 4.8 |
| Entry cost | 1.0 | 4.5 |
| Implementation cost | 0.5 | 4.2 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Ongoing cost | 2.0 | 3.5 |
HUMAN Security pricing
Enterprise pricing on request.
Screpy pricing
From $16/mo; tiered subscription plans published on site.
What users say
HUMAN Security
3 positive · 4 neutral · 0 negative
Screpy
3 positive · 6 neutral · 4 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
HUMAN Security scores 2.7 and Screpy scores 2.0 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/human-security/screpy, verified Nov 12, 2026)
Common questions
How do HUMAN Security and Screpy differ?
HUMAN Security is stronger on access Control & Policy Enforcement (4.5 vs 0.5), AI Traffic Monetization & Licensing (2.8 vs 0.2) and technical Performance & Scale (4.9 vs 2.8). Screpy is stronger on deployment & Time to Value (4.2 vs 1.5). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, HUMAN Security or Screpy?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — HUMAN Security scores 1.4/5 and Screpy scores 4.1/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (11 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers. See alternatives to HUMAN Security or alternatives to Screpy.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Four questions, and a scored stack across every benchmark — not just Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers
Every scored tool in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers, with the criteria behind each number
Every category, independently scored
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers.
