Screpy
Affordable AI bot traffic analytics and crawler monitoring
Best for small publishers.
Summary review · Last verified Oct 19, 2026 · Scored on 11 criteria · Vendors can't pay for scores
Research by Vahe Arabian · Scored and edited by the SODP team
Key facts
- Score
- 2.0 / 5
- Tier
- Limited
- Pricing model
- From $16/mo; tiered subscription plans…
- Type
- Bot & crawler analytics
- Founded
- 2020
- Headcount
- 14
At a glance
- Screpy scores 2.0/5 (Limited) in Benchmark Grid's independent bot & AI crawler analytics benchmark, assessed on 11 published criteria.
- It is built for small publishers.
- Strongest on Deployment & Time to Value (4.2) and Crawler Identification & Classification (3.2); weakest on AI Traffic Monetization & Licensing (0.2).
- Pricing: From $16/mo; tiered subscription plans published on site.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Summary
Editor's update: 19 Oct 2026 accuracy audit: features corrected to verified bot/AI crawler list, crawl trends and unsuccessful URLs; entry price added.
A lower-cost SEO and site monitoring suite that includes AI bot traffic analytics, showing which verified bots and AI crawlers access a site, crawl trends and unsuccessful URLs.
Score breakdown
2.0 = 0.45 × 2.22 capability + 0.40 × 1.00 publisher fit + 0.15 × 4.10 cost
Σ (criterion rating × weight) across 11 criteria · scale 1 (poor) → 5 (excellent)
Provides basic crawler monitoring, though lacks the depth of enterprise-grade security platforms.
11% of capability · What we check: The tool accurately labels incoming requests by distinguishing between beneficial search bots, malicious scrapers, and specific AI training crawlers.
Shows crawl trends for verified bots and AI crawlers accessing the site.
11% of capability · What we check: The dashboard displays all incoming bot traffic across the entire web property without excluding any domains or subdirectories.
Lists verified bots and AI crawlers with crawl trends and unsuccessful URLs, but reporting is shallow compared with dedicated tools.
10% of capability · What we check: The system provides specific data regarding which AI models or companies are accessing content and the volume of requests.
Explicitly lacks any enforcement, control, or blocking capability.
10% of capability · What we check: Administrators can block or allow specific bots from accessing sensitive content via granular rules or automated policy settings.
No features exist to manage or monetize AI bot interactions or licensing.
10% of capability · What we check: The platform tracks usage data required to facilitate financial agreements or licensing deals between publishers and AI companies.
General SEO and site monitoring are included, but it lacks specific publisher-focused workflows.
9% of capability · What we check: The tool generates clear summaries showing how AI traffic impacts the publisher’s unique content library and specific business metrics.
Basic reporting features are included, but advanced data export capabilities are not highlighted.
9% of capability · What we check: Users can programmatically pull raw log data or aggregated analytics reports into external business intelligence tools via APIs.
Optimized for small sites, meaning it lacks the architectural scale for enterprise-level traffic.
9% of capability · What we check: The solution processes high volumes of incoming traffic logs without causing latency or downtime on the publisher's main website.
Capable of monitoring bot behavior but cannot enforce governance policies.
8% of capability · What we check: The software allows users to manage and optimize how common search engines index site content versus unauthorized third-party crawlers.
Provides standard site monitoring data without clear, robust compliance frameworks for data privacy.
7% of capability · What we check: The platform ensures all tracking activities adhere to global data protection regulations like GDPR and CCPA regarding visitor information.
Designed for accessibility and speed, allowing small teams to start monitoring quickly.
6% of capability · What we check: The system achieves full operational status and provides actionable insights within one business day of initial installation.
Screpy scores 2.0/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/best-bot-ai-crawler-analytics-for-publishers/screpy, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- Accessible price point for smaller publishers
- Combines bot monitoring with wider SEO reporting
Limitations
- Shallow compared with dedicated bot analytics platforms
- No enforcement, control or licensing capability
Who uses it
We haven't detected any publishers running Screpy yet.
Cost of ownership
Pricing
From $16/mo; tiered subscription plans published on site.
Pricing unclear for your setup? — we'll make the introduction. Free, and it never affects the score.
Cost data sourced from vendor pricing pages and community signals. Vendors may dispute any factor.
What users say
Users appreciate this intuitive, affordable SEO suite for its ease of use and comprehensive tracking, though some report slow crawling, technical limitations, and a lack of depth.
Sources: Reddit 92% · X 8%
Most discussed
Recent quotes
"scrcpy bank apps screen black screen no control help"
Negative·X
"A la hora de jugar juegos con Minecraft o abrir screpy se apaga de repente"
Negative·Reddit·2y ago
"the root of the problem was that any page that contained a CMS collection was "uncrawlable" by tools like Screaming Frog, Screpy, etc."
Negative·Reddit·2y ago
"Screpy SEO Tools - This is a must-have! It’s incredibly intuitive and offers everything from keyword tracking to site audits. It’s perfect for beginners."
Positive·Reddit·2y ago
"Screpy SEO Tools - This has been a game-changer for me. It's user-friendly and offers a comprehensive set of tools for keyword research, site audits, and more. Perfect for anyone just starting out!"
Positive·Reddit·2y ago
13 mentions from 2 independent sources, each read and scored by our analyser. Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions shown above.
The company behind Screpy
Company facts come from an independent business-data record rather than the vendor's own site.
- Founded
- 2020
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership
- Public Company
Compare Screpy
The head-to-heads publishers look at most, then the closest contests in the same benchmark.
FAQ
How is Screpy scored?
Screpy scores 2.0 out of 5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Bot & AI Crawler Analytics for Publishers benchmark. The overall figure blends capability (45%), publisher fit (40%) and cost of ownership (15%). Capability is itself a weighted average of 11 criteria; the heaviest are crawler identification & classification (11%), traffic visibility & coverage (11%) and ai traffic reporting & analytics (10%). Vendors cannot pay for a score.
What size publisher is Screpy built for?
Screpy is built for small and local publishers. That is the vendor's own stated target, and it is one of the inputs to our publisher-fit score — a platform that suits a national newsroom often carries more operational load than a small one can absorb.
What does Screpy cost?
From $16/mo; tiered subscription plans published on site. Our cost-of-ownership score is 4.1/5, which weighs pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation cost, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost. Ask the vendor for a written first-year figure that includes implementation before you commit.
Can Screpy pay for a better score?
No. Scores come from our editorial review of the product's documentation, demos and public evidence. A vendor can claim this listing or request a re-review, but nothing they buy changes a score or a position.
Verify a claim
Enter a claim about Screpy and our AI will check it against the benchmark data on this page. Claims we have already fact-checked are listed below.
3 verifications remaining
Where to next
Is this your tool? Claim the listing, get your score badge or request a hands-on review. Neither changes the score.