Skip to main content

Klaviyo vs Salesforce Marketing Cloud

Last verified Oct 19, 2026

At a glance

  • Klaviyo scores 2.7/5 and Salesforce Marketing Cloud scores 3.2/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent cross-channel marketing platforms benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are compliance & consent management (Klaviyo 3.0, Salesforce Marketing Cloud 3.5) and pricing & scalability (Klaviyo 3.2, Salesforce Marketing Cloud 2.8); they are within 0.3 on 8 of 10 criteria.
  • Klaviyo is built for small and mid-market publishers; Salesforce Marketing Cloud for enterprise.
  • On total cost of ownership Klaviyo scores 3.5 and Salesforce Marketing Cloud 1.4 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 11 publishers use Klaviyo and 1 use Salesforce Marketing Cloud.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Klaviyo is stronger on pricing & Scalability (3.2 vs 2.8) and integration & Data Connectivity (4.5 vs 4.2).

Salesforce Marketing Cloud is stronger on compliance & Consent Management (3.5 vs 3.0) and personalisation & Content Delivery (4.1 vs 3.8).

Which one fits

Choose Klaviyo if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight pricing & Scalability, integration & Data Connectivity and support & Implementation heavily — Klaviyo leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Salesforce Marketing Cloud if…

  • You publish at enterprise scale.
  • You weight compliance & Consent Management, personalisation & Content Delivery and cross-Channel Orchestration heavily — Salesforce Marketing Cloud leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Klaviyo and Salesforce Marketing Cloud in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 11 scored tools are in Best Cross-Channel Marketing Platforms for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionKlaviyoSalesforce Marketing Cloud
Audience Segmentation & Identity14% of capability4.64.6
Cross-Channel Orchestration14% of capability4.24.4
Analytics & Attribution12% of capability3.93.8
Journey Automation & Triggering12% of capability4.34.3
Personalisation & Content Delivery12% of capability3.84.1
Integration & Data Connectivity10% of capability4.54.2
Compliance & Consent Management8% of capability3.03.5
Deliverability & Channel Performance8% of capability3.73.9
Pricing & Scalability6% of capability3.22.8
Support & Implementation4% of capability2.82.5
Capability45% of composite4.04.0
Publisher fit40% of composite1.03.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.51.4

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreKlaviyoSalesforce Marketing Cloud
Pricing transparency4.01.0
Entry cost4.51.0
Implementation cost4.00.5
Hidden-fee risk2.52.0
Ongoing cost2.52.5

Klaviyo pricing

Contact-based tiers; free to start

Salesforce Marketing Cloud pricing

Per-contact tiers; custom enterprise

What users say

Klaviyo

19 positive · 49 neutral · 17 negative

Salesforce Marketing Cloud

1 positive · 32 neutral · 8 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Klaviyo scores 2.7 and Salesforce Marketing Cloud scores 3.2 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Cross-Channel Marketing Platforms for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/klaviyo/salesforce-marketing-cloud, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Klaviyo and Salesforce Marketing Cloud differ?

Klaviyo is stronger on pricing & Scalability (3.2 vs 2.8) and integration & Data Connectivity (4.5 vs 4.2). Salesforce Marketing Cloud is stronger on compliance & Consent Management (3.5 vs 3.0) and personalisation & Content Delivery (4.1 vs 3.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Klaviyo or Salesforce Marketing Cloud?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Klaviyo scores 3.5/5 and Salesforce Marketing Cloud scores 1.4/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Cross-Channel Marketing Platforms for Publishers. See alternatives to Klaviyo or alternatives to Salesforce Marketing Cloud.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Cross-Channel Marketing Platforms for Publishers.

Another SideWhich platform is better for enterprise clients?