Skip to main content

At a glance

  • Pusher scores 2.8/5 and Pushwoosh scores 3.7/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent push notification services benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are automation & triggers (Pusher 2.0, Pushwoosh 4.1) and targeting & segmentation (Pusher 2.2, Pushwoosh 4.2); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Pusher is built for small, mid-market and enterprise publishers; Pushwoosh for small and mid-market.
  • On total cost of ownership Pusher scores 3.2 and Pushwoosh 3.6 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 0 publishers use Pusher and 5 use Pushwoosh.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Pushwoosh is stronger on automation & triggers (4.1 vs 2.0), targeting & segmentation (4.2 vs 2.2), analytics & attribution (3.8 vs 2.0) and opt-in rate optimisation (3.8 vs 2.0).

Which one fits

Choose Pusher if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight integration effort & page speed, privacy & compliance and delivery speed & reliability at scale heavily — Pusher leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Pushwoosh if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight automation & triggers, targeting & segmentation and opt-in rate optimisation heavily — Pushwoosh leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Pusher and Pushwoosh in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Push Notification Services.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Pusher · 0

No publisher adoption verified yet.

Head to head

CriterionPusherPushwoosh
Delivery speed & reliability at scale14% of capability4.84.6
Automation & triggers12% of capability2.04.1
Opt-in rate optimisation12% of capability2.03.8
Targeting & segmentation12% of capability2.24.2
Analytics & attribution10% of capability2.03.8
Integration effort & page speed8% of capability4.23.5
Monetisation8% of capability1.01.2
Platform coverage8% of capability4.64.7
Privacy & compliance8% of capability4.54.2
Rich content & formats8% of capability3.04.0
Capability45% of composite3.03.9
Publisher fit40% of composite2.53.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite3.23.6

Cost of ownership

Sub-scorePusherPushwoosh
Pricing transparency3.94.1
Entry cost3.74.4
Implementation cost3.83.8
Hidden-fee risk2.12.7
Ongoing cost2.52.9

Pusher pricing

Beams (push): free Sandbox up to 1,000 subscribers; Startup $29/month (10,000), Pro $99 (50,000), Business $199 (115,000), Premium $399/month (250,000). Channels (WebSockets) is priced separately, from $49 to $1,199/month.

Pushwoosh pricing

Free up to 1,000 MAU; Push only from $7 per 1,000 MAU (limited offer); Omnichannel $13 per 1,000 MAU; Email only $5 per 1,000 monthly recipients; custom plans above $3,000/month.

What users say

Pusher

1 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative

Pushwoosh

6 positive · 9 neutral · 13 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Pusher scores 2.8 and Pushwoosh scores 3.7 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Push Notification Services benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/pusher/pushwoosh, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do Pusher and Pushwoosh differ?

Pushwoosh is stronger on automation & triggers (4.1 vs 2.0), targeting & segmentation (4.2 vs 2.2), analytics & attribution (3.8 vs 2.0) and opt-in rate optimisation (3.8 vs 2.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Pusher or Pushwoosh?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Pusher scores 3.2/5 and Pushwoosh scores 3.6/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Push Notification Services. See alternatives to Pusher or alternatives to Pushwoosh.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Push Notification Services.

Side-by-SideWhich push notification service is better for small publishe...