Skip to main content

StoryChief vs Trello

Last verified Oct 19, 2026

At a glance

  • StoryChief scores 3.1/5 and Trello scores 2.9/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent editorial calendar software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are performance tracking (StoryChief 4.0, Trello 1.2) and multi-channel planning (StoryChief 4.7, Trello 3.0); they are within 0.3 on 4 of 10 criteria.
  • Both are built for small and mid-market publishers.
  • On total cost of ownership StoryChief scores 4.0 and Trello 4.7 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 2 publishers use StoryChief and 0 use Trello.
  • Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

StoryChief is stronger on performance tracking (4.0 vs 1.2), multi-channel planning (4.7 vs 3.0) and CMS & publishing integrations (4.8 vs 3.2).

Trello is stronger on permissions & security (4.2 vs 3.3).

Which one fits

Choose StoryChief if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight performance tracking, multi-channel planning and CMS & publishing integrations heavily — StoryChief leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Trello if…

  • You publish at small and mid-market scale.
  • You weight permissions & security, collaboration and usability heavily — Trello leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to StoryChief and Trello in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 12 scored tools are in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Trello · 0

No publisher adoption verified yet.

Head to head

CriterionStoryChiefTrello
Editorial workflow & approvals14% of capability4.23.5
Planning & scheduling views14% of capability4.63.8
CMS & publishing integrations12% of capability4.83.2
Collaboration12% of capability4.04.2
Custom fields & templates10% of capability4.03.8
Multi-channel planning10% of capability4.73.0
Performance tracking8% of capability4.01.2
Usability8% of capability4.44.5
Implementation & support6% of capability3.53.2
Permissions & security6% of capability3.34.2
Capability45% of composite4.23.5
Publisher fit40% of composite1.51.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite4.04.7

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreStoryChiefTrello
Pricing transparency4.84.8
Entry cost3.54.9
Implementation cost4.24.8
Hidden-fee risk4.04.5
Ongoing cost3.54.7

StoryChief pricing

Free trial available; Starter $59/month billed yearly ($69 monthly), Growth $279/month, Scale $449/month and Agency $81/month per workspace (yearly prices); Enterprise from EUR 1,000+/month.

Trello pricing

Free up to 10 collaborators; Standard $5/user/month. (vendor pricing page, verified 2026-08-06)

What users say

StoryChief

5 positive · 3 neutral · 1 negative

Trello

15 positive · 37 neutral · 19 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

StoryChief scores 3.1 and Trello scores 2.9 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Editorial Calendar Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/storychief/trello, verified Oct 19, 2026)

Common questions

How do StoryChief and Trello differ?

StoryChief is stronger on performance tracking (4.0 vs 1.2), multi-channel planning (4.7 vs 3.0) and CMS & publishing integrations (4.8 vs 3.2). Trello is stronger on permissions & security (4.2 vs 3.3). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, StoryChief or Trello?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — StoryChief scores 4.0/5 and Trello scores 4.7/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to StoryChief or alternatives to Trello.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Editorial Calendar Software.

Compare PricingWhich is cheaper, CoSchedule or Trello?