Airship vs ProPush
Airship
Enterprise-grade mobile engagement platform for orchestrating automated multi-channel customer journeys at scale
Publishers using it: 10 · incl. Boston Globe Media, CBS News, CBS Sports
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Airship scores 3.3/5 and ProPush scores 2.7/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent push notification services benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are automation & triggers (Airship 4.8, ProPush 0.6) and targeting & segmentation (Airship 4.8, ProPush 0.8); they are within 0.3 on 1 of 10 criteria.
- Airship is built for enterprise publishers; ProPush for small and mid-market.
- On total cost of ownership Airship scores 1.4 and ProPush 4.4 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 10 publishers use Airship and 0 use ProPush.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Airship is stronger on automation & triggers (4.8 vs 0.6), targeting & segmentation (4.8 vs 0.8) and platform coverage (4.8 vs 2.0).
ProPush is stronger on monetisation (4.8 vs 2.0).
Which one fits
Choose Airship if…
- You publish at enterprise scale.
- You weight automation & triggers, targeting & segmentation and platform coverage heavily — Airship leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose ProPush if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight monetisation and integration effort & page speed heavily — ProPush leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Airship and ProPush in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 2.8GravitecAutomated web push notification platform for publishers to increase traffic and reader retentionRead review
- 2.8PusherA leading real-time communication platform providing scalable WebSocket infrastructure and push notification APIs.Read review
- 2.9WebPushrHigh-performance web push notification platform with advanced segmentation and a generous 10k subscriber free tier.Read review
- 3.0WonderPush (a Brevo company)Unlimited push notifications for iOS, Android and WebRead review
All 12 scored tools are in Best Push Notification Services.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Airship · 10
ProPush · 0
No publisher adoption verified yet.
Head to head
| Criterion | Airship | ProPush |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery speed & reliability at scale14% of capability | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Automation & triggers12% of capability | 4.8 | 0.6 |
| Opt-in rate optimisation12% of capability | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Targeting & segmentation12% of capability | 4.8 | 0.8 |
| Analytics & attribution10% of capability | 4.5 | 3.8 |
| Integration effort & page speed8% of capability | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Monetisation8% of capability | 2.0 | 4.8 |
| Platform coverage8% of capability | 4.8 | 2.0 |
| Privacy & compliance8% of capability | 4.7 | 2.0 |
| Rich content & formats8% of capability | 4.7 | 3.0 |
| Capability45% of composite | 4.1 | 2.7 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 1.4 | 4.4 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Airship | ProPush |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 1.0 | 3.5 |
| Entry cost | 1.0 | 4.9 |
| Implementation cost | 1.5 | 4.5 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 2.4 | 4.4 |
| Ongoing cost | 1.2 | 4.7 |
Airship pricing
Custom quote for the Airship Experience Platform (AXP); a self-service, no-code Airship Essentials plan is also available. Prices are not published.
ProPush pricing
Free to join; publishers earn RevShare on notifications delivered to their subscribers, with weekly payouts.
What users say
Airship
4 positive · 5 neutral · 0 negative
ProPush
3 positive · 2 neutral · 0 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Airship scores 3.3 and ProPush scores 2.7 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Push Notification Services benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/airship/propush, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Airship and ProPush differ?
Airship is stronger on automation & triggers (4.8 vs 0.6), targeting & segmentation (4.8 vs 0.8) and platform coverage (4.8 vs 2.0). ProPush is stronger on monetisation (4.8 vs 2.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Airship or ProPush?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Airship scores 1.4/5 and ProPush scores 4.4/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Push Notification Services. See alternatives to Airship or alternatives to ProPush.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Push Notification Services.
