Skip to main content

Brand24 vs Muck Rack

Last verified Nov 11, 2026

At a glance

  • Brand24 scores 2.5/5 and Muck Rack scores 2.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent media monitoring & AI visibility tools benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are content licensing & data compliance (Brand24 2.2, Muck Rack 4.2) and sentiment & portrayal analysis (Brand24 4.0, Muck Rack 2.8); they are within 0.3 on 3 of 10 criteria.
  • Both are built for mid-market and enterprise publishers.
  • On total cost of ownership Brand24 scores 2.8 and Muck Rack 1.8 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 1 publishers use Brand24 and 2 use Muck Rack.
  • Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Brand24 is stronger on sentiment & portrayal analysis (4.0 vs 2.8) and integrations & export (3.8 vs 3.0).

Muck Rack is stronger on content licensing & data compliance (4.2 vs 2.2) and usability (4.6 vs 4.0).

Which one fits

Choose Brand24 if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight sentiment & portrayal analysis, integrations & export and accuracy & relevance filtering heavily — Brand24 leads on those in this benchmark.

Choose Muck Rack if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight content licensing & data compliance, usability and AI answer & LLM citation tracking heavily — Muck Rack leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Brand24 and Muck Rack in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 16 scored tools are in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Head to head

CriterionBrand24Muck Rack
Source coverage14% of capability4.24.2
Accuracy & relevance filtering12% of capability3.53.0
AI answer & LLM citation tracking12% of capability4.04.5
Content licensing & data compliance10% of capability2.24.2
Reporting & dashboards10% of capability4.04.1
Share of voice & competitive benchmarking10% of capability3.53.2
Integrations & export8% of capability3.83.0
Real-time alerting8% of capability4.54.0
Sentiment & portrayal analysis8% of capability4.02.8
Usability8% of capability4.04.6
Capability45% of composite3.83.8
Publisher fit40% of composite1.02.0
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.81.8

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreBrand24Muck Rack
Pricing transparency3.81.0
Entry cost2.10.9
Implementation cost3.82.7
Hidden-fee risk2.53.2
Ongoing cost1.81.4

Brand24 pricing

Paid plans from $199/mo (Individual) to $1,499/mo (Enterprise) when billed annually; 14-day free trial available.

Muck Rack pricing

Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote. Starter, Standard and Premier plans are priced by team size, with print and broadcast monitoring, social listening and press release distribution as add-ons.

What users say

Brand24

17 positive · 20 neutral · 3 negative

Muck Rack

16 positive · 14 neutral · 3 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Brand24 scores 2.5 and Muck Rack scores 2.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/brand24/muck-rack, verified Nov 11, 2026)

Common questions

How do Brand24 and Muck Rack differ?

Brand24 is stronger on sentiment & portrayal analysis (4.0 vs 2.8) and integrations & export (3.8 vs 3.0). Muck Rack is stronger on content licensing & data compliance (4.2 vs 2.2) and usability (4.6 vs 4.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Brand24 or Muck Rack?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Brand24 scores 2.8/5 and Muck Rack scores 1.8/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools. See alternatives to Brand24 or alternatives to Muck Rack.

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools.

Compare ToolsWhat are the key differences in their capabilities?