Ezoic vs Google AdX (via GAM)
Ezoic
AI-powered revenue infrastructure platform optimizing monetization and user experience for digital publishers
Publishers using it: 13 · incl. Kyiv Post, AppleToolBox, Austonia
Google AdX (via GAM)
A unified ad-serving and programmatic exchange platform for maximizing cross-screen digital revenue
Publishers using it: 672 · incl. 20 Minuten, ABC27, AccuWeather
Publishers running both: 9
Last verified Nov 13, 2026
At a glance
- Ezoic scores 4.3/5 and Google AdX (via GAM) scores 4.0/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent ad networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are integration & ad-ops workload (Ezoic 3.8, Google AdX (via GAM) 2.0) and ad quality & brand safety controls (Ezoic 3.0, Google AdX (via GAM) 4.6); they are within 0.3 on 2 of 10 criteria.
- Ezoic is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Google AdX (via GAM) for small, mid-market and enterprise.
- On total cost of ownership Ezoic scores 3.8 and Google AdX (via GAM) 2.2 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 13 publishers use Ezoic and 672 use Google AdX (via GAM); 9 run both.
- Scores last verified 13 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Ezoic is stronger on integration & ad-ops workload (3.8 vs 2.0) and eligibility & onboarding (4.2 vs 3.0).
Google AdX (via GAM) is stronger on ad quality & brand safety controls (4.6 vs 3.0) and publisher control & transparency (4.5 vs 3.0).
Which one fits
Choose Ezoic if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight integration & ad-ops workload, eligibility & onboarding and page speed & Core Web Vitals impact heavily — Ezoic leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Google AdX (via GAM) if…
- You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight ad quality & brand safety controls, publisher control & transparency and consent & privacy readiness heavily — Google AdX (via GAM) leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Ezoic and Google AdX (via GAM) in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 4.1Google AdSenseMonetize website content through automated high-quality ads targeted to your specific digital audienceRead review
- 4.1Media.netGlobal contextual advertising leader providing high-yield programmatic and native solutions for publishersRead review
- 4.1MediavineA full-service ad management platform optimizing revenue through lifestyle-focused programmatic advertisingRead review
- 4.1MonetizeMoreAI-driven ad operations platform for maximizing revenue through header bidding and fraud protectionRead review
All 36 scored tools are in Best Ad Networks for Publishers.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Running both (9): Kyiv Post, AppleToolBox, Notícias Automotivas, San Diego Reader, The Post Millennial, Chrome Unboxed, OwnTheYard.com, Tech Pilipinas and 1 more
Head to head
| Criterion | Ezoic | Google AdX (via GAM) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue yield & RPM uplift16% of capability | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| Demand access & header bidding14% of capability | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Ad quality & brand safety controls12% of capability | 3.0 | 4.6 |
| Publisher control & transparency12% of capability | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Page speed & Core Web Vitals impact10% of capability | 4.6 | 3.6 |
| Payment terms & reliability10% of capability | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Integration & ad-ops workload8% of capability | 3.8 | 2.0 |
| Reporting & reconciliation8% of capability | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Consent & privacy readiness5% of capability | 3.5 | 4.6 |
| Eligibility & onboarding5% of capability | 4.2 | 3.0 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.9 | 4.3 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.9 | 4.5 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.8 | 2.2 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Ezoic | Google AdX (via GAM) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 3.5 | 1.9 |
| Entry cost | 4.5 | 3.1 |
| Implementation cost | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 4.0 | 2.2 |
| Ongoing cost | 3.8 | 2.6 |
Ezoic pricing
Standard plan is free via a 10% revenue share model; Ezoic Premium involves a monthly subscription fee based on a site's revenue tier and guaranteed ROI.
Google AdX (via GAM) pricing
Free 'Small Business' tier available for up to 90-200 million monthly impressions; Ad Manager 360 requires custom enterprise pricing.
What users say
Ezoic
20 positive · 43 neutral · 30 negative
Google AdX (via GAM)
1 positive · 4 neutral · 2 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Ezoic scores 4.3 and Google AdX (via GAM) scores 4.0 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Ad Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/ezoic/google-adx-via-gam, verified Nov 13, 2026)
Common questions
How do Ezoic and Google AdX (via GAM) differ?
Ezoic is stronger on integration & ad-ops workload (3.8 vs 2.0) and eligibility & onboarding (4.2 vs 3.0). Google AdX (via GAM) is stronger on ad quality & brand safety controls (4.6 vs 3.0) and publisher control & transparency (4.5 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Ezoic or Google AdX (via GAM)?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Ezoic scores 3.8/5 and Google AdX (via GAM) scores 2.2/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Ad Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Ezoic or alternatives to Google AdX (via GAM).
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Ad Networks for Publishers.
