Skip to main content

Freestar vs Google AdX (via GAM)

Publishers running both: 31

Last verified Nov 11, 2026

At a glance

  • Freestar scores 3.8/5 and Google AdX (via GAM) scores 4.0/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent ad networks benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
  • The widest gaps are integration & ad-ops workload (Freestar 4.5, Google AdX (via GAM) 2.0) and payment terms & reliability (Freestar 2.5, Google AdX (via GAM) 4.8); they are within 0.3 on 3 of 10 criteria.
  • Freestar is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Google AdX (via GAM) for small, mid-market and enterprise.
  • On total cost of ownership Freestar scores 2.2 and Google AdX (via GAM) 2.2 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
  • In our tracking 39 publishers use Freestar and 672 use Google AdX (via GAM); 31 run both.
  • Scores last verified 11 Nov 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.

Where they differ

Freestar is stronger on integration & ad-ops workload (4.5 vs 2.0).

Google AdX (via GAM) is stronger on payment terms & reliability (4.8 vs 2.5), eligibility & onboarding (3.0 vs 1.5) and publisher control & transparency (4.5 vs 3.0).

Which one fits

Choose Freestar if…

  • You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight integration & ad-ops workload heavily — Freestar leads on it in this benchmark.

Choose Google AdX (via GAM) if…

  • You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
  • You weight payment terms & reliability, publisher control & transparency and eligibility & onboarding heavily — Google AdX (via GAM) leads on those in this benchmark.

Also weighing these

The nearest-scored tools to Freestar and Google AdX (via GAM) in this benchmark, listed A to Z.

All 36 scored tools are in Best Ad Networks for Publishers.

Who uses them

Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.

Running both (31): Boston Globe Media, Lee Enterprises, Liverpool Echo, Meetup, The Motley Fool, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Benzinga, CoinDesk and 23 more

Head to head

CriterionFreestarGoogle AdX (via GAM)
Revenue yield & RPM uplift16% of capability4.64.8
Demand access & header bidding14% of capability4.74.7
Ad quality & brand safety controls12% of capability4.54.6
Publisher control & transparency12% of capability3.04.5
Page speed & Core Web Vitals impact10% of capability3.03.6
Payment terms & reliability10% of capability2.54.8
Integration & ad-ops workload8% of capability4.52.0
Reporting & reconciliation8% of capability3.54.5
Consent & privacy readiness5% of capability3.54.6
Eligibility & onboarding5% of capability1.53.0
Capability45% of composite3.74.3
Publisher fit40% of composite4.54.5
Total cost of ownership15% of composite2.22.2

Cost of ownership

Sub-scoreFreestarGoogle AdX (via GAM)
Pricing transparency1.31.9
Entry cost0.93.1
Implementation cost2.61.1
Hidden-fee risk3.62.2
Ongoing cost2.62.6

Freestar pricing

Operates on a transparent revenue-share model; custom enterprise pricing typically requires a minimum of 1M to 5M monthly pageviews and 12 months of historical traffic data.

Google AdX (via GAM) pricing

Free 'Small Business' tier available for up to 90-200 million monthly impressions; Ad Manager 360 requires custom enterprise pricing.

What users say

Freestar

10 positive · 9 neutral · 2 negative

Google AdX (via GAM)

1 positive · 4 neutral · 2 negative

Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.

Freestar scores 3.8 and Google AdX (via GAM) scores 4.0 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Ad Networks for Publishers benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/freestar/google-adx-via-gam, verified Nov 11, 2026)

Common questions

How do Freestar and Google AdX (via GAM) differ?

Freestar is stronger on integration & ad-ops workload (4.5 vs 2.0). Google AdX (via GAM) is stronger on payment terms & reliability (4.8 vs 2.5), eligibility & onboarding (3.0 vs 1.5) and publisher control & transparency (4.5 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.

Which is cheaper, Freestar or Google AdX (via GAM)?

On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Freestar scores 2.2/5 and Google AdX (via GAM) scores 2.2/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.

How are these scores calculated?

Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.

Share:

Both tools are scored in Best Ad Networks for Publishers. See alternatives to Freestar or alternatives to Google AdX (via GAM).

Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Ad Networks for Publishers.

Another SideWhich ad network offers better publisher fit for small busin...