Kordiam vs Monday.com
Kordiam
Professional newsroom planning and editorial calendar platform for complex multi-channel workflows
Publishers using it: 5 · incl. Handelsblatt Media Group, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Erdee Media Groep
Monday.com
A versatile AI-powered Work OS for centralizing editorial workflows and cross-team project management
Publishers using it: 2 · incl. Hulu
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Kordiam scores 4.1/5 and Monday.com scores 3.0/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent editorial calendar software benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are editorial workflow & approvals (Kordiam 4.7, Monday.com 2.2) and cms & publishing integrations (Kordiam 4.6, Monday.com 2.4); they are within 0.3 on 3 of 10 criteria.
- Kordiam is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers; Monday.com for small, mid-market and enterprise.
- On total cost of ownership Kordiam scores 3.2 and Monday.com 4.1 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 5 publishers use Kordiam and 2 use Monday.com.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Kordiam is stronger on editorial workflow & approvals (4.7 vs 2.2), CMS & publishing integrations (4.6 vs 2.4) and multi-channel planning (4.6 vs 3.8).
Monday.com is stronger on usability (4.2 vs 2.8).
Which one fits
Choose Kordiam if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight editorial workflow & approvals, CMS & publishing integrations and multi-channel planning heavily — Kordiam leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Monday.com if…
- You publish at small, mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight usability, permissions & security and performance tracking heavily — Monday.com leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Kordiam and Monday.com in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 4.0AsanaAI-powered work management platform orchestrating complex editorial workflows and multi-channel content campaignsRead review
- 3.5MultiCollabGoogle Docs-style real-time collaboration and editorial commenting directly within the WordPress block editorRead review
- 3.8PublishPressProfessional editorial, permission, and workflow management tools for WordPress content teams and digital publishers.Read review
- 3.1StoryChiefA centralized platform to plan, create, and distribute content across multiple channels with AI-driven optimization.Read review
All 12 scored tools are in Best Editorial Calendar Software.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Head to head
| Criterion | Kordiam | Monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial workflow & approvals14% of capability | 4.7 | 2.2 |
| Planning & scheduling views14% of capability | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CMS & publishing integrations12% of capability | 4.6 | 2.4 |
| Collaboration12% of capability | 4.4 | 4.2 |
| Custom fields & templates10% of capability | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Multi-channel planning10% of capability | 4.6 | 3.8 |
| Performance tracking8% of capability | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| Usability8% of capability | 2.8 | 4.2 |
| Implementation & support6% of capability | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Permissions & security6% of capability | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| Capability45% of composite | 4.1 | 3.6 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.2 | 4.1 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Kordiam | Monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Entry cost | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| Implementation cost | 3.0 | 4.4 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 3.0 | 3.1 |
| Ongoing cost | 3.0 | 3.8 |
Kordiam pricing
Tiered pricing by team size rather than per seat, shown per month: Extra-Small (up to 5 users) $237/month billed yearly ($263 monthly) up to Large (41-60 users) $1,125/month billed yearly; Enterprise quoted. An optional Support & Security package adds about 40%.
Monday.com pricing
Free for up to 2 seats; paid plans start at $9/seat/month (Basic) with a 3-seat minimum; AI features use a credit-based billing system starting at $0.01/credit.
What users say
Kordiam
5 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative
Monday.com
6 positive · 34 neutral · 5 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Kordiam scores 4.1 and Monday.com scores 3.0 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Editorial Calendar Software benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/kordiam/monday-com, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Kordiam and Monday.com differ?
Kordiam is stronger on editorial workflow & approvals (4.7 vs 2.2), CMS & publishing integrations (4.6 vs 2.4) and multi-channel planning (4.6 vs 3.8). Monday.com is stronger on usability (4.2 vs 2.8). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Kordiam or Monday.com?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Kordiam scores 3.2/5 and Monday.com scores 4.1/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Editorial Calendar Software. See alternatives to Kordiam or alternatives to Monday.com.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Editorial Calendar Software.
