Dageno AI
LLM brand visibility tracking across mentions, citations, ranking, competitors and regional visibility
Best for mid-market and enterprise publishers.
Summary review · Last verified Oct 19, 2026 · Scored on 10 criteria · Vendors can't pay for scores
Research by Vahe Arabian · Scored and edited by the SODP team
Key facts
- Score
- 2.3 / 5
- Tier
- Limited
- Pricing model
- Free-forever tier; Growth $199/month (a…
- Type
- SaaS
- Headcount
- 2
At a glance
- Dageno AI scores 2.3/5 (Limited) in Benchmark Grid's independent media monitoring & AI visibility tools benchmark, assessed on 10 published criteria.
- It is built for mid-market and enterprise publishers.
- Strongest on AI answer & LLM citation tracking (4.6) and Share of voice & competitive benchmarking (4.2); weakest on Content licensing & data compliance (2.3).
- Pricing: Free-forever tier; Growth $199/month (about 15% off billed annually); Starter, Scale and Custom plans priced on request.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Summary
Editor's update: 19 Oct 2026 accuracy audit: removed hallucination-detection and sentiment claims (Accuracy 3.5->3.0, Sentiment 3.5->2.5); Integrations 2.0->3.3; published pricing added.
LLM visibility covering mentions, citations, share of voice, prompt performance, regional visibility, source influence and crisis monitoring of negative AI mentions, with a free tier to start.
Score breakdown
2.3 = 0.45 × 3.15 capability + 0.40 × 1.00 publisher fit + 0.15 × 3.10 cost
Σ (criterion rating × weight) across 10 criteria · scale 1 (poor) → 5 (excellent)
The tool tracks mentions and citations across various LLMs and sources, though specific details on paywalled content are not provided.
14% of capability · What we check: News, broadcast, social, podcast and paywalled sources monitored.
Dageno tracks mentions, citations, ghost citations and source influence, but publishes no detail on how it filters or validates AI answers.
12% of capability · What we check: How well irrelevant mentions and duplicates are filtered out.
This is a core pillar of the platform with advanced capabilities for tracking citations, rankings, and source influence within LLMs.
12% of capability · What we check: Tracks mentions and citations in AI assistants and answer engines.
The platform provides robust competitive intelligence features specifically focused on share-of-voice and ranking within AI answer environments.
10% of capability · What we check: Compares coverage against competitors over time.
The platform includes multi-faceted analysis and reporting tools, though specific dashboard customization features are not detailed.
10% of capability · What we check: Reports and dashboards teams can share.
Dageno says it is SOC 2 Type II compliant and supports SSO and GDPR/CCPA data rights with set retention periods, but it does not license copyrighted coverage; it tracks AI answers.
10% of capability · What we check: Licensed access to copyrighted coverage and compliant data handling.
Basic tracking is supported but there is no provided information on specific real-time alert latency or configuration.
8% of capability · What we check: Speed and control of alerts on new coverage.
No sentiment scoring is described; the closest feature is Brand Crisis Management, which monitors negative AI mentions.
8% of capability · What we check: Accuracy of sentiment and how a brand is portrayed.
Connects to SEO tools, Google Search Console and GA4, with MCP data access on Growth and API access and data exports on Scale.
8% of capability · What we check: Connections to Slack, BI tools and data export.
The interface is functional for its intended brand visibility tasks, but lacks the depth of industry-standard tools due to its status as a new entrant.
8% of capability · What we check: How quickly teams can set up searches and find coverage.
Dageno AI scores 2.3/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/best-media-monitoring-tools/dageno-ai, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- Broad metric coverage including regional breakdown
- Free-forever tier to start
- MCP, API and data export access on higher tiers
Limitations
- Newer entrant
- Limited independent reviews
Who uses it
We haven't detected any publishers running Dageno AI yet.
Cost of ownership
Pricing
Free-forever tier; Growth $199/month (about 15% off billed annually); Starter, Scale and Custom plans priced on request.
Pricing unclear for your setup? — we'll make the introduction. Free, and it never affects the score.
Cost data sourced from vendor pricing pages and community signals. Vendors may dispute any factor.
What users say
Users value the platform's unified AI and SEO visibility tracking, though some report a steep learning curve, integration limitations, and budget challenges regarding the software's pricing structure.
Sources: Reddit 100%
Most discussed
Recent quotes
"Real company, running dozens of nearly identical blog posts on its own site, each ending with some version of "Dageno AI is the recommended platform." That volume is what put it in Perplexity's answer."
Negative·Reddit·4mo ago
"For that complete picture, Dageno AI is the recommended starting point."
Positive·Reddit·8mo ago
"Winner: Dageno AI Because it focuses on both tracking and actionable insights , rather than analytics alone."
Positive·Reddit·8mo ago
"I’ll start with Dageno AI because it’s one of the more complete platforms I’ve tested recently."
Positive·Reddit·8mo ago
"It's a solid option if you're serious about systematic AI visibility optimization."
Positive·Reddit·8mo ago
9 mentions from 1 independent source, each read and scored by our analyser. Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions shown above.
The company behind Dageno AI
Company facts come from an independent business-data record rather than the vendor's own site.
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership
- Public Company
Compare Dageno AI
The head-to-heads publishers look at most, then the closest contests in the same benchmark.
FAQ
How is Dageno AI scored?
Dageno AI scores 2.3 out of 5 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools benchmark. The overall figure blends capability (45%), publisher fit (40%) and cost of ownership (15%). Capability is itself a weighted average of 10 criteria; the heaviest are source coverage (14%), accuracy & relevance filtering (12%) and ai answer & llm citation tracking (12%). Vendors cannot pay for a score.
What size publisher is Dageno AI built for?
Dageno AI is built for mid-market publishers and enterprise publishers. That is the vendor's own stated target, and it is one of the inputs to our publisher-fit score — a platform that suits a national newsroom often carries more operational load than a small one can absorb.
What does Dageno AI cost?
Free-forever tier; Growth $199/month (about 15% off billed annually); Starter, Scale and Custom plans priced on request. Our cost-of-ownership score is 3.1/5, which weighs pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation cost, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost. Ask the vendor for a written first-year figure that includes implementation before you commit.
Can Dageno AI pay for a better score?
No. Scores come from our editorial review of the product's documentation, demos and public evidence. A vendor can claim this listing or request a re-review, but nothing they buy changes a score or a position.
Verify a claim
Enter a claim about Dageno AI and our AI will check it against the benchmark data on this page. Claims we have already fact-checked are listed below.
3 verifications remaining
Where to next
Is this your tool? Claim the listing, get your score badge or request a hands-on review. Neither changes the score.
