Determ vs Muck Rack
Determ
AI-powered real-time media monitoring and social listening for brand reputation and market insights
Publishers using it: —
Muck Rack
Comprehensive PR management platform for journalist discovery, media monitoring, and AI-driven reporting
Publishers using it: 2 · incl. MIT Technology Review, Penguin Random House
Last verified Oct 19, 2026
At a glance
- Determ scores 2.4/5 and Muck Rack scores 2.8/5 in Benchmark Grid's independent media monitoring & AI visibility tools benchmark, both assessed on the same 10 criteria.
- The widest gaps are content licensing & data compliance (Determ 1.5, Muck Rack 4.2) and ai answer & llm citation tracking (Determ 2.0, Muck Rack 4.5); they are within 0.3 on 1 of 10 criteria.
- Determ is built for small and mid-market publishers; Muck Rack for mid-market and enterprise.
- On total cost of ownership Determ scores 3.3 and Muck Rack 1.8 (higher means better value, not a lower price).
- In our tracking 0 publishers use Determ and 2 use Muck Rack.
- Scores last verified 19 Oct 2026. Vendors cannot pay for a score or a position.
Where they differ
Determ is stronger on sentiment & portrayal analysis (4.0 vs 2.8).
Muck Rack is stronger on content licensing & data compliance (4.2 vs 1.5), AI answer & LLM citation tracking (4.5 vs 2.0) and usability (4.6 vs 3.0).
Which one fits
Choose Determ if…
- You publish at small and mid-market scale.
- You weight sentiment & portrayal analysis, share of voice & competitive benchmarking and accuracy & relevance filtering heavily — Determ leads on those in this benchmark.
Choose Muck Rack if…
- You publish at mid-market and enterprise scale.
- You weight content licensing & data compliance, AI answer & LLM citation tracking and usability heavily — Muck Rack leads on those in this benchmark.
Also weighing these
The nearest-scored tools to Determ and Muck Rack in this benchmark, listed A to Z.
- 2.5Brand24AI-powered social listening and media monitoring across news and digital platformsRead review
- 2.5BrandwatchEnterprise social intelligence suite for consumer insights and reputation managementRead review
- 2.6CisionComprehensive earned media and PR intelligence platform for enterprise communications and distributionRead review
- 2.6MeltwaterGlobal AI-powered media intelligence for PR communications and marketing teamsRead review
All 16 scored tools are in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools.
Who uses them
Publishers we have detected running each tool, from ads.txt, site code and published case studies. Agencies, brands and vendors are excluded.
Determ · 0
No publisher adoption verified yet.
Muck Rack · 2
Head to head
| Criterion | Determ | Muck Rack |
|---|---|---|
| Source coverage14% of capability | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| Accuracy & relevance filtering12% of capability | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| AI answer & LLM citation tracking12% of capability | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Content licensing & data compliance10% of capability | 1.5 | 4.2 |
| Reporting & dashboards10% of capability | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| Share of voice & competitive benchmarking10% of capability | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| Integrations & export8% of capability | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| Real-time alerting8% of capability | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Sentiment & portrayal analysis8% of capability | 4.0 | 2.8 |
| Usability8% of capability | 3.0 | 4.6 |
| Capability45% of composite | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| Publisher fit40% of composite | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Total cost of ownership15% of composite | 3.3 | 1.8 |
Cost of ownership
| Sub-score | Determ | Muck Rack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 4.5 | 1.0 |
| Entry cost | 2.5 | 0.9 |
| Implementation cost | 3.8 | 2.7 |
| Hidden-fee risk | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Ongoing cost | 2.7 | 1.4 |
Determ pricing
Expand EUR 299/month (EUR 249/month billed annually); Command EUR 499/month (EUR 416/month billed annually); Custom plans quoted.
Muck Rack pricing
Custom pricing; contact the vendor for a quote. Starter, Standard and Premier plans are priced by team size, with print and broadcast monitoring, social listening and press release distribution as add-ons.
What users say
Determ
5 positive · 2 neutral · 1 negative
Muck Rack
16 positive · 14 neutral · 3 negative
Mentions we could not tie to a real user, and those flagged as promotional, are excluded. Sentiment is opinion, and is independent of the verified publisher adoptions above.
Determ scores 2.4 and Muck Rack scores 2.8 in Benchmark Grid's independent Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools benchmark (benchmarkgrid.com/vs/determ/muck-rack, verified Oct 19, 2026)
Common questions
How do Determ and Muck Rack differ?
Determ is stronger on sentiment & portrayal analysis (4.0 vs 2.8). Muck Rack is stronger on content licensing & data compliance (4.2 vs 1.5), AI answer & LLM citation tracking (4.5 vs 2.0) and usability (4.6 vs 3.0). Neither is better in the abstract — which one suits you depends on which of those dimensions carries the most weight in your operation.
Which is cheaper, Determ or Muck Rack?
On total cost of ownership — pricing transparency, entry cost, implementation, hidden-fee risk and ongoing cost — Determ scores 3.3/5 and Muck Rack scores 1.8/5. A higher score means better value, not a lower sticker price.
How are these scores calculated?
Each tool is assessed against its category's published criteria (10 in this benchmark), which make up Capability (45% of the composite), Publisher fit (40%) and Total cost of ownership (15%). Assessment is carried out by SODP's editorial team against a published methodology. Vendors cannot pay for inclusion, scores or positions.
Share:
Both tools are scored in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools. See alternatives to Determ or alternatives to Muck Rack.
Weighing a third option? Add a tool to this comparison.
Where to next
Four questions, and a scored stack across every benchmark — not just Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools
Every scored tool in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools, with the criteria behind each number
Every category, independently scored
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads publishers look at in Best Media Monitoring & AI Visibility Tools.
